ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF

Expense Ratio
0.85%
Dividend
1.18%
Previous close
$37.86
Est. 12 months change
+9.84%
Projected Price
$41.59

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
18.98%
Return on Assets (ROA)
5.45%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
11.07%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
6.69%
ROIC - WACC
4.38%
Updated : 2026-04-03 17:52 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
16.00
Forward P/E
14.76
PEG Ratio
3.15
Debt Current Ratio
1.17

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
43.76%
Operating Margin
18.27%
FCF Margin
13.37%
TTM Revenue Growth
4.25%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
8.43%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-1.43%
Price % from 200 SMA
4.82%
6 Months
5.55%
1 Year
10.91%
2 Years
25.18%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
L16.04%
UL10.58%
OKE10.44%
VZ9.68%
MDT8.60%
EOG8.60%
HON7.55%
TRV6.78%
IEX5.46%
EMR5.28%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) currently reports 13 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the highly focused range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is L (16.04%), UL (10.58%), OKE (10.44%), with L as the largest single weight at 16.04%. Together, the top three holdings account for 37.06%, which implies that short-term performance can be meaningfully influenced by a narrow set of large constituents. The weight distribution suggests a portfolio designed to capture thematic upside while avoiding excessive dependence on any single name outside the largest positions.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Assessing the quality of returns on invested capital, ROIC is 11.07%, WACC is 6.69%, and the economic spread is 4.38%. On balance, the economic spread is thin but positive — the portfolio's businesses are clearing the hurdle, though without significant headroom. Supporting metrics show ROE at 18.98% and ROA at 5.45%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

The market currently prices the portfolio at trailing P/E of 16.00, forward P/E of 14.76, PEG of 3.15. The gap between P/E and forward P/E is small, suggesting the valuation is not contingent on a near-term earnings step-change. The PEG ratio signals premium pricing — the portfolio's earnings growth expectations, while present, do not fully explain the current multiple on a purely quantitative basis. The current ratio of 1.17 is below average, suggesting some holdings may face tighter short-term financial conditions. Valuation and liquidity together frame a portfolio where the price paid today is a reasonable bet on earnings delivery — but not a margin-of-safety purchase at current levels.

Margins & Cash Generation

Looking at margins from gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 43.76%, operating margin at 18.27%, and free cash flow margin at 13.37%. Gross margins are constructive — not exceptional, but indicative of businesses with reasonable unit economics. At this level, operating margins reflect businesses that are scaling with discipline without dramatic cost pressure. The portfolio's cash conversion is middle-of-the-road — sufficient for operational needs, but leaving limited surplus for discretionary allocation. Together, these margins describe a portfolio where business quality varies — and where macro or sector headwinds could disproportionately impact the weaker-margin holdings.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Projected 12-month EPS growth of 8.4% is a constructive signal — measured earnings expansion supports the forward valuation case without relying on aggressive extrapolation. Zooming out from the valuation discussion, TTM revenue growth of 4.25% indicating muted but still positive top-line momentum across the portfolio, while the estimated 12-month price change of 9.94%, where street expectations indicate a low-ceiling return setup in the near term. Anchoring to reported revenues provides discipline; analyst price targets add context about how the market currently values that operating reality. The path to realizing analyst-implied returns runs through revenue execution, margin stability, and a macro environment that doesn't undermine either. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The fundamental picture is not broken, but neither is it clearly compelling — a hold posture reflects the absence of an obvious catalyst for re-rating in either direction.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.