ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF

Expense Ratio
1%
Dividend
0.71%
Previous close
$42.18
Est. 12 months change
-1.32%
Projected Price
$41.63

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
10.02%
Return on Assets (ROA)
4.64%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
0.96%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
8.95%
ROIC - WACC
-7.99%
Updated : 2026-04-03 19:23 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
20.83
Forward P/E
13.90
PEG Ratio
3.22
Debt Current Ratio
3.01

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
42.22%
Operating Margin
12.84%
FCF Margin
13.41%
TTM Revenue Growth
9.87%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
49.86%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-3.39%
Price % from 200 SMA
0.09%
6 Months
-2.34%
1 Year
22.60%
2 Years
42.51%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
WDC6.24%
AU5.70%
TIGO5.39%
FTI5.07%
VTRS4.97%
PR4.54%
ROIV4.38%
ELAN4.22%
APA4.03%
SNDK3.99%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) currently reports 26 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the narrowly constructed range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is WDC (6.24%), AU (5.70%), TIGO (5.39%), with WDC as the largest single weight at 6.24%. Together, the top three holdings account for 17.33%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 0.96%, WACC is 8.95%, and the economic spread is -7.99%. On balance, capital is being deployed at rates below what debt and equity holders require, a headwind to long-term value creation if sustained. Supporting metrics show ROE at 10.02% and ROA at 4.64%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 20.83, forward P/E of 13.90, PEG of 3.22. The spread between trailing and forward P/E is moderate, suggesting some earnings improvement is expected but not a dramatic re-rating. The PEG ratio is elevated, suggesting investors are paying a premium for the growth embedded in current earnings estimates. A current ratio reading of 3.01 suggests the portfolio's businesses are well-capitalized for near-term needs. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.

Margins & Cash Generation

Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 42.22%, operating margin at 12.84%, and free cash flow margin at 13.41%. Gross margins sit in a healthy range, consistent with businesses that manage input costs effectively. At this level, operating margins reflect holdings where operational leverage has not yet fully materialized. At this level, free cash flow generation is present but not a defining strength of the portfolio's underlying businesses. Read together, these margin levels suggest a portfolio where earnings durability is present in parts but not consistent across the full holding set.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Two key indicators frame the near-term view: TTM revenue growth of 9.87% a signal of steady demand without the volatility of high-growth names, while the estimated 12-month price change of -1.33%, where implied returns are negative based on the present target distribution. The near-term return case is built on whether reported trends and analyst projections can remain close enough to make current prices look justified. Whether the setup resolves positively or negatively will depend as much on the macro backdrop as on the capacity of the underlying businesses to deliver against current estimates. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

The balance of evidence is not favorable enough to recommend action — this profile is best approached defensively, with a focus on understanding the downside scenarios before committing capital.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.