ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

Expense Ratio
0.75%
Dividend
0.27%
Previous close
$114.90
Est. 12 months change
+26.76%
Projected Price
$145.65

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
7.10%
Return on Assets (ROA)
3.15%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
21.30%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
12.40%
ROIC - WACC
8.90%
Updated : 2026-04-03 18:59 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
55.09
Forward P/E
38.19
PEG Ratio
2.20
Debt Current Ratio
4.45

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
42.20%
Operating Margin
-4.40%
FCF Margin
18.44%
TTM Revenue Growth
40.93%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
44.26%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-5.32%
Price % from 200 SMA
3.49%
6 Months
-0.61%
1 Year
68.03%
2 Years
115.41%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
TSLA10.49%
TER9.21%
KTOS6.77%
AMD4.99%
RKLB4.79%
DE4.66%
PLTR4.65%
GOOG3.68%
LHX3.61%
AVAV3.28%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) currently reports 36 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is TSLA (10.49%), TER (9.21%), KTOS (6.77%), with TSLA as the largest single weight at 10.49%. Together, the top three holdings account for 26.47%, which suggests a more balanced distribution of weight across the portfolio, reducing single-name sensitivity at the top. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 21.30%, WACC is 12.40%, and the economic spread is 8.90%. On balance, the economic spread is positive but compressed — adequate for value preservation, less convincing for aggressive compounding. Supporting metrics show ROE at 7.10% and ROA at 3.15%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

From a pricing standpoint, the portfolio sits at trailing P/E of 55.09, forward P/E of 38.19, PEG of 2.20. A wide spread between trailing and forward P/E implies the market is embedding substantial earnings improvement into current prices. The growth-adjusted multiple is neither a strong buy signal nor a clear warning — it sits in the range where execution quality will determine whether the price is ultimately justified. A current ratio of 4.45 across the holding set reflects strong short-term liquidity. In total, the multiple and liquidity readings describe a portfolio where valuation is a secondary risk relative to earnings delivery — the numbers are defensible if estimates hold.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 42.20%, operating margin at -4.40%, and free cash flow margin at 18.44%. Gross margins are healthy, suggesting solid pricing power across the underlying holdings. At this operating margin level, businesses are generating little to no earnings after overhead — a sign of early-stage or high-investment dynamics. At this FCF margin level, the underlying holdings demonstrate good cash generation relative to the revenue base. Across the three margin layers, the picture is inconsistent — a reminder that aggregate metrics can mask meaningful variation at the individual holding level.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of 40.93% indicating strong organic momentum at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 27.03%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At 44.3%, the projected 12-month EPS growth rate is strong enough to be a primary driver of the forward investment case rather than a peripheral supporting detail. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Overall, the fundamentals support a constructive stance — execution remains the key driver of whether the forward case is fully validated.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.