ASLV Allspring Special Large Value ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| GOOG | 5.01% |
| NEE | 4.70% |
| TSX:CP | 3.99% |
| XOM | 3.88% |
| Q | 3.75% |
| COF | 3.33% |
| LH | 3.30% |
| JNJ | 3.28% |
| HON | 3.24% |
| AMZN | 3.07% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) currently reports 43 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately spread range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is GOOG (5.01%), NEE (4.70%), TSX:CP (3.99%), with GOOG as the largest single weight at 5.01%. Together, the top three holdings account for 13.70%, which does not represent a dominant share, indicating less concentration in the very top of the book. The overall construction balances concentrated exposure at the top with broader diversification through the rest of the book.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Through the lens of capital efficiency, ROIC is 12.64%, WACC is 8.06%, and the economic spread is 4.58%. On balance, ROIC edges above WACC, suggesting the businesses are value-creative in aggregate, if not dramatically so. Supporting metrics show ROE at 21.15% and ROA at 6.77%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.
Valuation
From a market pricing perspective, trailing P/E of 23.84, forward P/E of 18.40, PEG of 2.29. A modest gap between trailing and forward multiples implies the market is pricing incremental earnings improvement rather than a step-change in profitability. On a growth-adjusted basis, valuation appears reasonable relative to expected growth. The portfolio's weighted current ratio of 1.40 suggests near-term liquidity is more constrained than average. The overall valuation picture is one where the market is paying for a specific earnings and growth outcome — and where any deviation from that path would likely pressure multiples.
Margins & Cash Generation
The margin profile breaks down as follows: gross margin sits at 50.94%, operating margin at 19.50%, and free cash flow margin at 18.64%. Gross margins are in good shape, suggesting the holdings maintain pricing discipline at the revenue-to-cost interface. Operating margins are solid, reflecting adequate cost control relative to the revenue base. The portfolio's FCF margin is healthy, indicating solid cash conversion after capital expenditure needs. The mixed margin profile here calls for selectivity — the portfolio's quality of earnings is not uniform across the holding set.
Growth & Forward Outlook
The growth and outlook picture reads as follows: TTM revenue growth of 8.45% pointing to reasonable revenue execution across the underlying holdings. In parallel, analysts project moderate appreciation over the next 12 months based on current consensus targets. The gap between trailing fundamentals and forward expectations matters most at inflection points — and the current environment is not without those. For long-term holders, the central question is whether today's execution quality is a leading indicator of what's already priced into analyst targets. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
BuyThe data points reviewed collectively point toward a positive outcome if execution holds — the setup is favorable even accounting for the inherent uncertainty in forward estimates.
This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.