AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF

Expense Ratio
0.27%
Dividend
2.69%
Previous close
$48.77
Est. 12 months change
+11.67%
Projected Price
$54.46

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
20.02%
Return on Assets (ROA)
5.91%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
12.77%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
6.68%
ROIC - WACC
6.09%
Updated : 2026-04-03 18:14 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
16.36
Forward P/E
12.91
PEG Ratio
2.99
Debt Current Ratio
3.41

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
50.34%
Operating Margin
25.54%
FCF Margin
19.32%
TTM Revenue Growth
17.34%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
26.78%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-0.35%
Price % from 200 SMA
4.72%
6 Months
5.20%
1 Year
11.04%
2 Years
20.83%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
VZ2.61%
RPRX2.38%
T2.21%
JNJ1.69%
MO1.66%
CME1.62%
LIN1.61%
CSCO1.59%
WMT1.58%
LMT1.56%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) currently reports 194 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the widely diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is VZ (2.61%), RPRX (2.38%), T (2.21%), with VZ as the largest single weight at 2.61%. Together, the top three holdings account for 7.20%, which suggests a more balanced distribution of weight across the portfolio, reducing single-name sensitivity at the top. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 12.77%, WACC is 6.68%, and the economic spread is 6.09%. On balance, the economic spread is positive but compressed — adequate for value preservation, less convincing for aggressive compounding. Supporting metrics show ROE at 20.02% and ROA at 5.91%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

From a pricing standpoint, the portfolio sits at trailing P/E of 16.36, forward P/E of 12.91, PEG of 2.99. The narrow spread between trailing and forward multiples implies earnings expectations are relatively stable — the portfolio is not being priced for an earnings inflection. A PEG above 2.5 implies investors are paying well above fair value for the growth embedded in estimates — a setup that typically leaves little room for earnings disappointment. A current ratio of 3.41 across the holding set reflects strong short-term liquidity. In total, the multiple and liquidity readings describe a portfolio where valuation is a secondary risk relative to earnings delivery — the numbers are defensible if estimates hold.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 50.34%, operating margin at 25.54%, and free cash flow margin at 19.32%. Gross margins are healthy, suggesting solid pricing power across the underlying holdings. The operating margin reading is constructive, suggesting management teams are managing overhead costs effectively. At this FCF margin level, the underlying holdings demonstrate good cash generation relative to the revenue base. Together, these margin readings describe a portfolio of businesses that protect profitability at every layer of the income statement.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of 17.34% indicating steady top-line growth at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 11.79%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At 26.8%, the projected 12-month EPS growth rate is strong enough to be a primary driver of the forward investment case rather than a peripheral supporting detail. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Overall, the fundamentals support a constructive stance — execution remains the key driver of whether the forward case is fully validated.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.