BUSA Brandes U.S. Value ETF

Expense Ratio
0.6%
Dividend
1.54%
Previous close
$37.30
Est. 12 months change
+15.98%
Projected Price
$43.26

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
14.39%
Return on Assets (ROA)
5.89%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
14.29%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
6.81%
ROIC - WACC
7.49%
Updated : 2026-04-04 05:20 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
17.18
Forward P/E
13.08
PEG Ratio
1.71
Debt Current Ratio
1.36

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
38.08%
Operating Margin
18.44%
FCF Margin
13.26%
TTM Revenue Growth
8.79%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
31.30%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-1.95%
Price % from 200 SMA
4.48%
6 Months
6.53%
1 Year
13.30%
2 Years
21.82%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
MRK2.98%
C2.75%
TXT2.63%
HAL2.57%
CVX2.48%
FDX2.42%
PFE2.42%
BAC2.40%
CI2.30%
BDX2.23%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) currently reports 64 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately broad range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is MRK (2.98%), C (2.75%), TXT (2.63%), with MRK as the largest single weight at 2.98%. Together, the top three holdings account for 8.36%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 14.29%, WACC is 6.81%, and the economic spread is 7.49%. On balance, the spread between ROIC and WACC is narrow, leaving little buffer but still pointing to net positive value generation. Supporting metrics show ROE at 14.39% and ROA at 5.89%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 17.18, forward P/E of 13.08, PEG of 1.71. The gap between trailing and forward multiples is not especially wide, suggesting the market is pricing a steadier earnings path rather than a sharp near-term re-rating. The PEG ratio sits in a range that most investors would consider fair — neither cheap nor obviously stretched relative to anticipated earnings. A current ratio reading of 1.36 suggests the portfolio's holdings carry less short-term financial cushion than the broader market average. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.

Margins & Cash Generation

Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 38.08%, operating margin at 18.44%, and free cash flow margin at 13.26%. The portfolio's gross margins reflect businesses operating in environments with meaningful cost pressure at the production layer. Operating margins are in good shape, consistent with businesses that maintain reasonable earnings conversion after overhead. At this level, free cash flow generation is present but not a defining strength of the portfolio's underlying businesses. Read together, these margin levels suggest a portfolio where earnings durability is present in parts but not consistent across the full holding set.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Two key indicators frame the near-term view: TTM revenue growth of 8.79% a signal of steady demand without the volatility of high-growth names, while the estimated 12-month price change of 16.14%, where the target distribution indicates incremental upside rather than outsized repricing. The near-term return case is built on whether reported trends and analyst projections can remain close enough to make current prices look justified. Whether the setup resolves positively or negatively will depend as much on the macro backdrop as on the capacity of the underlying businesses to deliver against current estimates. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Balancing the strengths against the areas of uncertainty, the weight of evidence favors an optimistic view with appropriate risk awareness.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.