DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.01% |
| AAPL | 6.47% |
| LLY | 4.36% |
| META | 4.17% |
| MSFT | 4.15% |
| V | 3.97% |
| MA | 2.37% |
| HD | 2.27% |
| CAT | 2.17% |
| MRK | 1.83% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) currently reports 159 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the widely spread range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (7.01%), AAPL (6.47%), LLY (4.36%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 7.01%. Together, the top three holdings account for 17.84%, which points to a relatively flat weight distribution where no single cluster of names dominates outcomes. The weight distribution suggests a portfolio designed to capture thematic upside while avoiding excessive dependence on any single name outside the largest positions.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Assessing the quality of returns on invested capital, ROIC is 41.59%, WACC is 9.42%, and the economic spread is 32.17%. On balance, the underlying businesses generate returns on capital that dramatically exceed their funding costs — a rare and powerful compounding dynamic. Supporting metrics show ROE at 70.89% and ROA at 15.72%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.
Valuation
The market currently prices the portfolio at trailing P/E of 26.22, forward P/E of 20.44, PEG of 2.07. The trailing and forward multiples diverge by a moderate amount, consistent with a market that sees improving earnings but is not extrapolating an aggressive growth path. The PEG ratio is consistent with a portfolio that is reasonably valued on a growth basis — not cheap, but not obviously expensive either. The current ratio of 1.56 is in an acceptable range, reflecting reasonable short-term financial health. Valuation and liquidity together frame a portfolio where the price paid today is a reasonable bet on earnings delivery — but not a margin-of-safety purchase at current levels.
Margins & Cash Generation
Looking at margins from gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 56.82%, operating margin at 31.81%, and free cash flow margin at 22.32%. Gross margins are constructive — not exceptional, but indicative of businesses with reasonable unit economics. Exceptional operating margins signal that overhead costs are well managed relative to the revenue base. The portfolio's cash conversion is solid — a sign that operating profits are translating into real liquidity at the fund level. All three margin layers are constructive, pointing to a portfolio where quality of earnings is high and cash generation is reliable.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Projected 12-month EPS growth of 28.3% adds a powerful forward signal — analyst consensus expects earnings to accelerate materially, which, if delivered, could make current multiples look increasingly modest. Turning to growth and analyst expectations, TTM revenue growth of 17.01% pointing to stable operational progress without outsized acceleration, while the estimated 12-month price change of 22.80%, where target prices point to mid-range appreciation potential from current levels. The distinction matters: revenue growth tells you what the businesses are doing, price targets tell you what analysts think the market will pay for it. Ultimately, the alignment between revenue momentum and analyst targets will depend on execution quality and the broader rate and sentiment environment. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
Strong BuyThe quantitative profile, taken as a whole, is above average on virtually every dimension that matters for long-term return generation.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.