FITE State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| QLYS | 2.15% |
| NABL | 2.06% |
| RPD | 1.87% |
| S | 1.83% |
| PANW | 1.78% |
| TENB | 1.76% |
| VSAT | 1.74% |
| DCO | 1.71% |
| ZS | 1.70% |
| NET | 1.68% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) currently reports 77 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is QLYS (2.15%), NABL (2.06%), RPD (1.87%), with QLYS as the largest single weight at 2.15%. Together, the top three holdings account for 6.08%, which indicates that performance drivers are distributed more evenly across the broader basket. This architecture allows the fund to express a clear investment thesis at the top while relying on the broader basket to manage idiosyncratic volatility.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
From a capital efficiency perspective, ROIC is 5.88%, WACC is 9.40%, and the economic spread is -3.51%. On balance, holdings are currently generating returns below their cost of capital, which may weigh on intrinsic value over time. Supporting metrics show ROE at 10.06% and ROA at 1.50%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
Multiple analysis puts the portfolio at trailing P/E of 26.71, forward P/E of 23.74, PEG of 4.22. Trailing and forward multiples are nearly identical, indicating the market is pricing the portfolio on a relatively static earnings assumption. Growth-adjusted, the portfolio is priced at a premium — a level that demands consistent execution and limits the potential for multiple expansion from here. At 2.28, the aggregate current ratio indicates adequate but not exceptional balance sheet coverage. The combined valuation and liquidity profile points to a portfolio where current prices embed meaningful growth expectations, and where delivery against those expectations will drive the return outcome.
Margins & Cash Generation
On the margin front: gross margin sits at 47.57%, operating margin at -6.08%, and free cash flow margin at 18.59%. At this level, the portfolio reflects reasonable cost discipline and adequate pricing leverage at the production layer. The operating margin reading is weak, suggesting cost structures are outpacing revenue generation across much of the portfolio. Strong free cash flow margins point to businesses with meaningful financial flexibility and limited dependence on external capital. The margin stack is not uniformly strong, which means the portfolio's earnings resilience under adverse conditions is less certain.
Growth & Forward Outlook
The two main inputs to the near-term picture — TTM revenue growth of 33.93% reflecting robust top-line expansion across the underlying holdings. Forecasted EPS growth of 12.5% over the next year is supportive of the current valuation, suggesting the market is not paying for earnings that won't arrive. Analyst price targets suggest street expectations imply a constructive but measured return profile on a 12-month view. Revenue momentum establishes the baseline; analyst price targets reveal how much the market is already paying for future execution on top of that baseline. Delivered returns will ultimately be shaped by the gap — or lack thereof — between operating execution and the expectations embedded in current prices. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
HoldOverall, the setup is mixed enough that patience is probably the right posture until clarity improves on the key variables.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.