FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF

Expense Ratio
0.15%
Dividend
1.24%
Previous close
$73.06
Est. 12 months change
+21.28%
Projected Price
$88.60

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
62.78%
Return on Assets (ROA)
16.59%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
44.97%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.46%
ROIC - WACC
35.51%
Updated : 2026-04-03 21:52 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
25.66
Forward P/E
20.77
PEG Ratio
2.07
Debt Current Ratio
1.75

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
60.62%
Operating Margin
34.85%
FCF Margin
26.52%
TTM Revenue Growth
17.48%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
23.52%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-3.13%
Price % from 200 SMA
-1.22%
6 Months
-2.68%
1 Year
12.97%
2 Years
25.16%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NVDA7.56%
AAPL6.71%
GOOGL5.10%
MSFT5.06%
AVGO3.02%
META2.21%
JPM1.87%
LLY1.60%
JNJ1.47%
V1.38%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) currently reports 124 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the highly diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (7.56%), AAPL (6.71%), GOOGL (5.10%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 7.56%. Together, the top three holdings account for 19.37%, which implies a more democratized weight structure where the broader holding set matters as much as the leadership group. This structure gives the portfolio a dual character: meaningful exposure to its highest-conviction names, alongside enough breadth to dampen idiosyncratic noise.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Examining the portfolio through a capital allocation lens, ROIC is 44.97%, WACC is 9.46%, and the economic spread is 35.51%. On balance, the economic spread here is exceptional — few portfolios sustain this kind of gap between operating returns and cost of capital. Supporting metrics show ROE at 62.78% and ROA at 16.59%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

Turning to how the market is pricing the underlying earnings, trailing P/E of 25.66, forward P/E of 20.77, PEG of 2.07. Trailing and forward valuations are closely aligned, pointing to a market that is pricing continuity rather than improvement in the earnings outlook. A PEG in this range suggests valuation is fair rather than compelling — the portfolio is priced adequately for its growth, with limited buffer for downside revisions. The aggregate current ratio of 1.75 reflects a holding set with workable near-term liquidity positions. The combined picture across P/E, forward P/E, PEG, and current ratio suggests a portfolio that is priced for continued execution — where disappointment would be costly and outperformance would likely require positive earnings surprises.

Margins & Cash Generation

From gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 60.62%, operating margin at 34.85%, and free cash flow margin at 26.52%. At this level, gross margins reflect the kind of pricing power and cost insulation that characterizes category-leading businesses. The portfolio's operating margins are well above average, pointing to businesses that manage the full cost stack with discipline. At this level, FCF margins reflect a portfolio of businesses with genuine capital efficiency and strong cash-based earnings quality. Taken together, the margin profile reflects a collection of businesses with genuine competitive advantages — capable of sustaining profitability and generating cash across a range of economic conditions.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Combining revenue momentum with analyst targets, the estimated 12-month price change of 21.49%, where consensus expectations favor gradual appreciation over the next year, while TTM revenue growth of 17.48% reflecting moderate but reliable revenue progress across the basket. Separating operating reality from market-implied expectations is useful here — they can diverge meaningfully when sentiment shifts. The forward return case hinges on whether the operating reality stays close enough to analyst assumptions for those targets to remain credible. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

When all the evidence is placed side by side, this profile stands out as one with genuine compounding characteristics and limited structural headwinds.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.