FRI First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| WELL | 11.72% |
| PLD | 10.47% |
| SPG | 5.04% |
| EQIX | 5.02% |
| DLR | 4.93% |
| O | 4.81% |
| PSA | 3.69% |
| VTR | 3.29% |
| IRM | 2.52% |
| VICI | 2.48% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) currently reports 130 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the widely spread range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is WELL (11.72%), PLD (10.47%), SPG (5.04%), with WELL as the largest single weight at 11.72%. Together, the top three holdings account for 27.23%, which points to a relatively flat weight distribution where no single cluster of names dominates outcomes. The weight distribution suggests a portfolio designed to capture thematic upside while avoiding excessive dependence on any single name outside the largest positions.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Assessing the quality of returns on invested capital, ROIC is 4.35%, WACC is 7.86%, and the economic spread is -3.51%. On balance, the portfolio's businesses are not clearing their capital cost hurdle, meaning reinvestment may be diluting rather than compounding value. Supporting metrics show ROE at 12.18% and ROA at 2.85%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
The current pricing of the underlying holdings reads trailing P/E of 29.34, forward P/E of 35.13, PEG of 11.20. The small spread between trailing and forward P/E suggests neither meaningful acceleration nor deterioration is currently priced into the earnings outlook. The PEG reading here is above the range most value-oriented investors would find comfortable — the valuation requires a high degree of confidence in forward earnings delivery. The current ratio of 1.86 is in an acceptable range, reflecting reasonable short-term financial health. In aggregate, the valuation reads as fair to moderately stretched — leaving the investment case dependent on earnings execution rather than multiple expansion.
Margins & Cash Generation
Looking at margins from gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 65.75%, operating margin at 31.85%, and free cash flow margin at 9.05%. The gross margin here is a standout, pointing to businesses with durable unit economics and limited commodity exposure. Exceptional operating margins signal that overhead costs are well managed relative to the revenue base. The portfolio's cash conversion is middle-of-the-road — sufficient for operational needs, but leaving limited surplus for discretionary allocation. Together, these margins describe a portfolio where business quality varies — and where macro or sector headwinds could disproportionately impact the weaker-margin holdings.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Projected 12-month EPS growth of -16.5% is a meaningful caution flag — declining earnings expectations add pressure to the valuation case and limit the margin of safety. Turning to growth and analyst expectations, TTM revenue growth of 10.02% pointing to stable operational progress without outsized acceleration, while the estimated 12-month price change of 10.15%, where target prices point to mid-range appreciation potential from current levels. The distinction matters: revenue growth tells you what the businesses are doing, price targets tell you what analysts think the market will pay for it. Ultimately, the alignment between revenue momentum and analyst targets will depend on execution quality and the broader rate and sentiment environment. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
HoldThe fundamental picture is not broken, but neither is it clearly compelling — a hold posture reflects the absence of an obvious catalyst for re-rating in either direction.
These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.