FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF

Expense Ratio
0.36%
Dividend
0.24%
Previous close
$34.09
Est. 12 months change
+23.63%
Projected Price
$42.15

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
-3.86%
Return on Assets (ROA)
1.70%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
4.28%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.97%
ROIC - WACC
-5.69%
Updated : 2026-05-20 19:44 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
15.08
Forward P/E
14.35
PEG Ratio
1.78
Debt Current Ratio
3.04

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
41.83%
Operating Margin
-0.15%
FCF Margin
16.30%
TTM Revenue Growth
43.38%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
5.12%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
6.93%
Price % from 200 SMA
11.81%
6 Months
22.47%
1 Year
35.34%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
AHR2.35%
BE2.13%
BTSG1.39%
POWL1.36%
MIRM1.31%
JXN1.18%
BKU1.12%
SPHR1.10%
EME1.03%
PRIM0.99%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) currently reports 301 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the widely diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is AHR (2.35%), BE (2.13%), BTSG (1.39%), with AHR as the largest single weight at 2.35%. Together, the top three holdings account for 5.87%, which suggests a more balanced distribution of weight across the portfolio, reducing single-name sensitivity at the top. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 4.28%, WACC is 9.97%, and the economic spread is -5.69%. On balance, returns on capital are currently insufficient to clear the funding cost hurdle, which historically correlates with pressure on long-term value creation. Supporting metrics show ROE at -3.86% and ROA at 1.70%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 15.08, forward P/E of 14.35, PEG of 1.78. The gap between trailing and forward multiples is not especially wide, suggesting the market is pricing a steadier earnings path rather than a sharp near-term re-rating. The PEG ratio sits in a range that most investors would consider fair — neither cheap nor obviously stretched relative to anticipated earnings. A current ratio of 3.04 across the holding set reflects strong short-term liquidity. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 41.83%, operating margin at -0.15%, and free cash flow margin at 16.30%. Gross margins are healthy, suggesting solid pricing power across the underlying holdings. At this operating margin level, businesses are generating little to no earnings after overhead — a sign of early-stage or high-investment dynamics. At this FCF margin level, the underlying holdings demonstrate good cash generation relative to the revenue base. Across the three margin layers, the picture is inconsistent — a reminder that aggregate metrics can mask meaningful variation at the individual holding level.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of 43.38% indicating strong organic momentum at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 23.87%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At 5.1%, projected EPS growth is present and positive — not a standout catalyst, but a stabilizing element in the overall forward picture. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The balance of evidence suggests a neutral posture is appropriate — there are merits here, but also reasons for caution that limit conviction at current levels.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.