FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

Expense Ratio
0.08%
Dividend
0.45%
Previous close
$212.53
Est. 12 months change
+32.51%
Projected Price
$281.64

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
60.43%
Return on Assets (ROA)
19.06%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
57.04%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
12.06%
ROIC - WACC
44.98%
Updated : 2026-04-04 07:32 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
31.92
Forward P/E
20.47
PEG Ratio
1.79
Debt Current Ratio
2.43

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
60.00%
Operating Margin
29.32%
FCF Margin
29.70%
TTM Revenue Growth
33.62%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
55.98%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-2.37%
Price % from 200 SMA
-1.96%
6 Months
-5.81%
1 Year
29.61%
2 Years
37.63%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NVDA18.21%
AAPL15.90%
MSFT10.06%
AVGO4.36%
MU2.19%
AMD1.78%
CSCO1.75%
PLTR1.73%
AMAT1.49%
LRCX1.47%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) currently reports 276 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the index-like in breadth range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (18.21%), AAPL (15.90%), MSFT (10.06%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 18.21%. Together, the top three holdings account for 44.17%, which creates a leadership-driven return profile where the top names carry disproportionate influence over fund outcomes. In aggregate, the construction reflects a balance between directional conviction and the diversification benefits that come from a broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On the question of capital productivity, ROIC is 57.04%, WACC is 12.06%, and the economic spread is 44.98%. On balance, the spread between returns and capital costs is exceptional, meaning reinvested capital is creating significant incremental value at the portfolio level. Supporting metrics show ROE at 60.43% and ROA at 19.06%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

On a multiple basis, the portfolio trades at trailing P/E of 31.92, forward P/E of 20.47, PEG of 1.79. The trailing-to-forward compression is notable, pointing to an earnings growth narrative that, if delivered, would make current valuations more defensible. At this PEG level, valuation is defensible given the growth outlook, though there is limited margin of safety against estimate disappointments. The portfolio carries an aggregate current ratio of 2.43, consistent with adequate near-term liquidity management. The valuation setup is broadly consistent with a market that is pricing growth without being reckless about it — a balanced but not cautious stance.

Margins & Cash Generation

The margin stack reads as follows: gross margin sits at 60.00%, operating margin at 29.32%, and free cash flow margin at 29.70%. The gross margin reading points to holdings with solid but not outsized pricing power relative to direct costs. The portfolio's operating margins are solid, pointing to holdings where overhead management is a relative strength. The portfolio's FCF margin is a standout — reflecting businesses where accounting profits translate cleanly into real cash generation. The margin profile across gross, operating, and free cash flow levels is consistently strong — a rare combination that typically indicates durable business quality.

Growth & Forward Outlook

The forward view combines two signals: the estimated 12-month price change of 32.84%, where the forward target set implies considerable headroom versus current levels, while TTM revenue growth of 33.62% suggesting the portfolio's businesses are collectively capturing meaningful market share or pricing power. The projected 12-month EPS growth rate of 56.0% is a standout component of the forward case — meaningful earnings expansion at this scale typically warrants attention from growth-oriented investors. One metric reflects operational reality, the other market expectation — both are useful inputs, but neither should be read in isolation. The interaction between revenue execution and analyst repricing will ultimately determine how closely realized returns track current expectations. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

Putting all the pieces together, the fundamental picture is one of the more convincing setups in these metrics — strong capital returns, reasonable pricing, and a healthy forward outlook.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.