FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

Expense Ratio
0.08%
Dividend
0.36%
Previous close
$266.18
Est. 12 months change
+14.74%
Projected Price
$305.43

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
59.83%
Return on Assets (ROA)
20.02%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
58.35%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
12.63%
ROIC - WACC
45.72%
Updated : 2026-05-19 19:49 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
33.93
Forward P/E
24.16
PEG Ratio
1.63
Debt Current Ratio
2.51

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
59.39%
Operating Margin
29.62%
FCF Margin
29.72%
TTM Revenue Growth
43.51%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
40.41%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
13.59%
Price % from 200 SMA
18.62%
6 Months
21.07%
1 Year
45.40%
2 Years
68.16%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NVDA19.65%
AAPL14.57%
MSFT8.99%
AVGO4.33%
MU3.52%
AMD2.94%
INTC2.16%
CSCO1.87%
LRCX1.54%
AMAT1.44%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) currently reports 282 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the index-like in breadth range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (19.65%), AAPL (14.57%), MSFT (8.99%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 19.65%. Together, the top three holdings account for 43.21%, which creates a leadership-driven return profile where the top names carry disproportionate influence over fund outcomes. In aggregate, the construction reflects a balance between directional conviction and the diversification benefits that come from a broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On the question of capital productivity, ROIC is 58.35%, WACC is 12.63%, and the economic spread is 45.72%. On balance, the spread between returns and capital costs is exceptional, meaning reinvested capital is creating significant incremental value at the portfolio level. Supporting metrics show ROE at 59.83% and ROA at 20.02%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

On a multiple basis, the portfolio trades at trailing P/E of 33.93, forward P/E of 24.16, PEG of 1.63. Forward P/E is below trailing by a moderate margin, pointing to modest earnings expectations that support the current valuation without relying on outsized growth. At this PEG level, valuation is defensible given the growth outlook, though there is limited margin of safety against estimate disappointments. The portfolio's holdings carry a current ratio of 2.51, pointing to strong short-term financial health. The valuation setup is broadly consistent with a market that is pricing growth without being reckless about it — a balanced but not cautious stance.

Margins & Cash Generation

The margin stack reads as follows: gross margin sits at 59.39%, operating margin at 29.62%, and free cash flow margin at 29.72%. The gross margin reading points to holdings with solid but not outsized pricing power relative to direct costs. The portfolio's operating margins are solid, pointing to holdings where overhead management is a relative strength. The portfolio's FCF margin is a standout — reflecting businesses where accounting profits translate cleanly into real cash generation. The margin profile across gross, operating, and free cash flow levels is consistently strong — a rare combination that typically indicates durable business quality.

Growth & Forward Outlook

The forward view combines two signals: the estimated 12-month price change of 14.89%, where analyst assumptions support a moderate upside case if execution remains steady, while TTM revenue growth of 43.51% suggesting the portfolio's businesses are collectively capturing meaningful market share or pricing power. The projected 12-month EPS growth rate of 40.4% is a standout component of the forward case — meaningful earnings expansion at this scale typically warrants attention from growth-oriented investors. One metric reflects operational reality, the other market expectation — both are useful inputs, but neither should be read in isolation. The interaction between revenue execution and analyst repricing will ultimately determine how closely realized returns track current expectations. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

Putting all the pieces together, the fundamental picture is one of the more convincing setups in these metrics — strong capital returns, reasonable pricing, and a healthy forward outlook.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.