FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| BAC | 8.47% |
| C | 8.08% |
| JPM | 7.82% |
| WFC | 7.40% |
| TFC | 7.33% |
| PNC | 4.10% |
| CFG | 3.98% |
| USB | 3.98% |
| MTB | 3.95% |
| HBAN | 3.21% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) currently reports 51 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the selectively diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is BAC (8.47%), C (8.08%), JPM (7.82%), with BAC as the largest single weight at 8.47%. Together, the top three holdings account for 24.37%, which points to a relatively flat weight distribution where no single cluster of names dominates outcomes. The weight distribution suggests a portfolio designed to capture thematic upside while avoiding excessive dependence on any single name outside the largest positions.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Assessing the quality of returns on invested capital, ROIC is -6.62%, WACC is 5.06%, and the economic spread is -11.68%. On balance, the portfolio's businesses are not clearing their capital cost hurdle, meaning reinvestment may be diluting rather than compounding value. Supporting metrics show ROE at 11.40% and ROA at -5.37%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
The current pricing of the underlying holdings reads trailing P/E of 13.24, forward P/E of 11.81, PEG of 1.01. The small spread between trailing and forward P/E suggests neither meaningful acceleration nor deterioration is currently priced into the earnings outlook. The PEG ratio is low enough to suggest the valuation is supported by earnings growth expectations rather than multiple expansion alone. The current ratio of 2.09 is in an acceptable range, reflecting reasonable short-term financial health. In aggregate, the valuation reads as fair to moderately stretched — leaving the investment case dependent on earnings execution rather than multiple expansion.
Margins & Cash Generation
Looking at margins from gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at -26.49%, operating margin at 39.77%, and free cash flow margin at 29.24%. The gross margin reading is low, suggesting the underlying businesses operate in cost-intensive or highly competitive environments. Exceptional operating margins signal that overhead costs are well managed relative to the revenue base. Outstanding free cash flow margins signal businesses that convert revenues into cash at rates that support both reinvestment and shareholder returns. Together, these margins describe a portfolio where business quality varies — and where macro or sector headwinds could disproportionately impact the weaker-margin holdings.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Projected 12-month EPS growth of 12.1% is a constructive signal — measured earnings expansion supports the forward valuation case without relying on aggressive extrapolation. Turning to growth and analyst expectations, TTM revenue growth of 19.98% pointing to stable operational progress without outsized acceleration, while the estimated 12-month price change of 9.27%, where street expectations indicate a low-ceiling return setup in the near term. The distinction matters: revenue growth tells you what the businesses are doing, price targets tell you what analysts think the market will pay for it. Ultimately, the alignment between revenue momentum and analyst targets will depend on execution quality and the broader rate and sentiment environment. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
HoldThe fundamental picture is not broken, but neither is it clearly compelling — a hold posture reflects the absence of an obvious catalyst for re-rating in either direction.
These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.