GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

Expense Ratio
0.45%
Dividend
0.30%
Previous close
$174.72
Est. 12 months change
+28.58%
Projected Price
$224.66

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
47.01%
Return on Assets (ROA)
10.40%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
30.52%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
11.40%
ROIC - WACC
19.12%
Updated : 2026-10-06 21:40 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
30.17
Forward P/E
22.82
PEG Ratio
1.36
Debt Current Ratio
2.32

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
54.55%
Operating Margin
-84.37%
FCF Margin
25.24%
TTM Revenue Growth
56.54%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
32.18%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
META2.64%
AMD2.57%
INTC2.50%
MU2.42%
TMO2.37%
WBD2.37%
SNDK2.33%
AAPL2.31%
TSM2.31%
SPCX2.27%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) currently reports 49 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately spread range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is META (2.64%), AMD (2.57%), INTC (2.50%), with META as the largest single weight at 2.64%. Together, the top three holdings account for 7.71%, which does not represent a dominant share, indicating less concentration in the very top of the book. The overall construction balances concentrated exposure at the top with broader diversification through the rest of the book.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Through the lens of capital efficiency, ROIC is 30.52%, WACC is 11.40%, and the economic spread is 19.12%. On balance, the gap between operating returns and funding costs is healthy, pointing to businesses with genuine pricing and reinvestment advantages. Supporting metrics show ROE at 47.01% and ROA at 10.40%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

From a market pricing perspective, trailing P/E of 30.17, forward P/E of 22.82, PEG of 1.36. A modest gap between trailing and forward multiples implies the market is pricing incremental earnings improvement rather than a step-change in profitability. The PEG ratio suggests the market may be underpricing the portfolio's growth trajectory relative to its current multiple. The portfolio's weighted current ratio of 2.32 reflects adequate near-term financial stability. The overall valuation picture is one where the market is paying for a specific earnings and growth outcome — and where any deviation from that path would likely pressure multiples.

Margins & Cash Generation

The margin profile breaks down as follows: gross margin sits at 54.55%, operating margin at -84.37%, and free cash flow margin at 25.24%. Gross margins are in good shape, suggesting the holdings maintain pricing discipline at the revenue-to-cost interface. Operating margins are very thin or negative, indicating the portfolio's holdings are spending heavily relative to revenues. FCF margins at this level reflect businesses that fund growth entirely from internal resources, with significant cash left over. The mixed margin profile here calls for selectivity — the portfolio's quality of earnings is not uniform across the holding set.

Growth & Forward Outlook

The growth and outlook picture reads as follows: TTM revenue growth of 56.54% pointing to healthy demand conditions for the businesses represented in the fund. In parallel, analysts project moderate appreciation over the next 12 months based on current consensus targets. The gap between trailing fundamentals and forward expectations matters most at inflection points — and the current environment is not without those. For long-term holders, the central question is whether today's execution quality is a leading indicator of what's already priced into analyst targets. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

Reviewed in aggregate, this is a high-quality profile with few clear structural weaknesses — a combination that historically tends to support above-average long-term outcomes.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.