IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| AAPL | 8.78% |
| NVDA | 8.46% |
| MSFT | 8.25% |
| AVGO | 8.18% |
| GOOGL | 4.66% |
| META | 4.18% |
| GOOG | 3.74% |
| NFLX | 2.69% |
| MU | 2.52% |
| PLTR | 2.21% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) currently reports 288 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the expansively diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is AAPL (8.78%), NVDA (8.46%), MSFT (8.25%), with AAPL as the largest single weight at 8.78%. Together, the top three holdings account for 25.49%, which indicates that idiosyncratic risk at the top of the book is relatively contained within the overall portfolio. The resulting profile combines thematic conviction with varying degrees of diversification, which can support upside participation while still spreading idiosyncratic risk beyond the top weights.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
From a returns-on-capital standpoint, ROIC is 44.30%, WACC is 11.52%, and the economic spread is 32.78%. On balance, the gap between ROIC and WACC places this portfolio among the more capital-efficient baskets available. Supporting metrics show ROE at 46.15% and ROA at 15.38%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.
Valuation
The market currently prices the portfolio at trailing P/E of 32.56, forward P/E of 20.51, PEG of 1.61. Trailing P/E is materially above forward P/E — a spread that typically signals expected earnings growth and a portfolio that is cheaper on a forward basis than it first appears. The PEG ratio is consistent with a portfolio that is reasonably valued on a growth basis — not cheap, but not obviously expensive either. The aggregate current ratio of 2.30 points to adequate liquidity across holdings. Valuation and liquidity together frame a portfolio where the price paid today is a reasonable bet on earnings delivery — but not a margin-of-safety purchase at current levels.
Margins & Cash Generation
On profitability at each income statement layer, gross margin sits at 61.55%, operating margin at 30.78%, and free cash flow margin at 27.91%. Gross margins are well above average, signaling strong production-level economics across the holding set. At this operating margin level, the underlying holdings demonstrate a clear ability to scale profitably. Free cash flow conversion is outstanding — the portfolio's holdings are generating exceptional cash after capital expenditures. Across all three layers, the margin stack points to a high-quality portfolio with durable unit economics and strong cash generation capacity.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Looking at what the businesses are actually delivering versus what analysts are pricing in, TTM revenue growth of 30.82% indicating that revenue growth remains a meaningful tailwind for the portfolio. At the same time, the estimated 12-month price change of 31.35%, where target-based upside appears notably strong in the current setup. Revenue growth captures operating momentum, while price targets reflect external expectations that can move with rates, risk appetite, and sector sentiment. Whether current momentum translates into delivered returns will depend on the durability of both top-line trends and the assumptions embedded in analyst targets. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
Strong BuyThe composite of ROIC spread, valuation, revenue momentum, and analyst expectations delivers a rare alignment of quality and growth that justifies elevated conviction.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.