IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF

Expense Ratio
0.37%
Dividend
0.96%
Previous close
$56.76
Est. 12 months change
+18.20%
Projected Price
$67.09

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
9.58%
Return on Assets (ROA)
4.26%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
25.46%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
7.52%
ROIC - WACC
17.94%
Updated : 2026-10-09 21:34 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
21.18
Forward P/E
16.07
PEG Ratio
1.68
Debt Current Ratio
1.58

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
28.90%
Operating Margin
6.16%
FCF Margin
8.44%
TTM Revenue Growth
10.12%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
31.79%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
UNH21.85%
CVS12.13%
ELV9.51%
VEEV4.96%
HCA4.68%
HUM4.61%
CI4.50%
CNC4.19%
LH3.32%
DGX3.31%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) currently reports 62 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is UNH (21.85%), CVS (12.13%), ELV (9.51%), with UNH as the largest single weight at 21.85%. Together, the top three holdings account for 43.49%, which represents a dominant share and increases sensitivity to the performance of a narrow leadership group. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 25.46%, WACC is 7.52%, and the economic spread is 17.94%. On balance, ROIC clears WACC by a meaningful margin, suggesting the portfolio's holdings are creating rather than consuming intrinsic value. Supporting metrics show ROE at 9.58% and ROA at 4.26%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 21.18, forward P/E of 16.07, PEG of 1.68. The spread between trailing and forward P/E is moderate, suggesting some earnings improvement is expected but not a dramatic re-rating. The PEG ratio sits in a range that most investors would consider fair — neither cheap nor obviously stretched relative to anticipated earnings. A current ratio of 1.58 suggests the holdings have sufficient short-term liquidity without excess. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 28.90%, operating margin at 6.16%, and free cash flow margin at 8.44%. Gross margins are moderate, reflecting industry conditions where input costs weigh more heavily on revenue. At this operating margin level, cost efficiency is present but limited — overhead is a visible drag on earnings conversion. At this FCF margin level, cash conversion is functional without being a standout feature of the portfolio's quality profile. Across the three margin layers, the picture is inconsistent — a reminder that aggregate metrics can mask meaningful variation at the individual holding level.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Revenue trends and analyst expectations together suggest: TTM revenue growth of 10.12% indicating steady top-line growth at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 18.38%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At 31.8%, the projected 12-month EPS growth rate is strong enough to be a primary driver of the forward investment case rather than a peripheral supporting detail. There is always distance between what is reported and what is priced; the question of whether that distance is closing or widening is what makes the setup interesting. In either direction, the fundamental driver of returns will be whether the underlying businesses can sustain the trajectory that is already being priced. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Overall, the fundamentals support a constructive stance — execution remains the key driver of whether the forward case is fully validated.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.