IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF

Expense Ratio
0.18%
Dividend
1.71%
Previous close
$137.35
Est. 12 months change
+15.75%
Projected Price
$158.98

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
13.19%
Return on Assets (ROA)
4.79%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
9.21%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
7.78%
ROIC - WACC
1.42%
Updated : 2026-05-19 20:13 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
17.25
Forward P/E
12.47
PEG Ratio
2.43
Debt Current Ratio
2.43

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
39.76%
Operating Margin
17.32%
FCF Margin
14.70%
TTM Revenue Growth
14.66%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
38.30%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
0.42%
Price % from 200 SMA
2.86%
6 Months
9.42%
1 Year
11.97%
2 Years
16.69%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
RS1.17%
USFD1.12%
WCC1.10%
SNX1.06%
AA1.04%
OVV0.98%
NLY0.96%
PFGC0.92%
PR0.91%
WSO0.88%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) currently reports 302 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the expansively diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is RS (1.17%), USFD (1.12%), WCC (1.10%), with RS as the largest single weight at 1.17%. Together, the top three holdings account for 3.39%, which indicates that idiosyncratic risk at the top of the book is relatively contained within the overall portfolio. The resulting profile combines thematic conviction with varying degrees of diversification, which can support upside participation while still spreading idiosyncratic risk beyond the top weights.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

From a returns-on-capital standpoint, ROIC is 9.21%, WACC is 7.78%, and the economic spread is 1.42%. On balance, the portfolio clears its capital cost hurdle modestly — value creation is present but not emphatic. Supporting metrics show ROE at 13.19% and ROA at 4.79%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

The market currently prices the portfolio at trailing P/E of 17.25, forward P/E of 12.47, PEG of 2.43. The gap between P/E and forward P/E is small, suggesting the valuation is not contingent on a near-term earnings step-change. The PEG ratio is consistent with a portfolio that is reasonably valued on a growth basis — not cheap, but not obviously expensive either. The aggregate current ratio of 2.43 points to adequate liquidity across holdings. Valuation and liquidity together frame a portfolio where the price paid today is a reasonable bet on earnings delivery — but not a margin-of-safety purchase at current levels.

Margins & Cash Generation

On profitability at each income statement layer, gross margin sits at 39.76%, operating margin at 17.32%, and free cash flow margin at 14.70%. Gross margins are moderate, pointing to holdings where unit economics are functional but not a source of structural advantage. At this operating margin level, the holdings demonstrate competent cost management and reasonable earnings durability. Free cash flow margins are moderate, with a meaningful but not exceptional share of revenue converting to cash after capex. Taken together, the margin stack suggests quality that is uneven — some layers are more resilient than others, and that asymmetry matters under stress.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Looking at what the businesses are actually delivering versus what analysts are pricing in, TTM revenue growth of 14.66% indicating top-line growth that is constructive without being speculative. At the same time, the estimated 12-month price change of 15.91%, where implied upside appears constructive but not aggressive. Revenue growth captures operating momentum, while price targets reflect external expectations that can move with rates, risk appetite, and sector sentiment. Whether current momentum translates into delivered returns will depend on the durability of both top-line trends and the assumptions embedded in analyst targets. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Putting the pieces together, this is a profile with genuine merit: the numbers support confidence in the forward case without requiring heroic assumptions.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.