ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF

Expense Ratio
0.38%
Dividend
1.24%
Previous close
$91.38
Est. 12 months change
+22.25%
Projected Price
$111.71

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
26.71%
Return on Assets (ROA)
9.48%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
16.26%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.89%
ROIC - WACC
6.37%
Updated : 2026-04-06 21:39 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
14.30
Forward P/E
14.67
PEG Ratio
2.86
Debt Current Ratio
5.26

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
27.84%
Operating Margin
13.54%
FCF Margin
9.70%
TTM Revenue Growth
-0.91%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
-2.52%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-9.57%
Price % from 200 SMA
-10.63%
6 Months
-14.60%
1 Year
-1.26%
2 Years
-18.32%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
DHI15.08%
PHM9.21%
LEN7.65%
NVR7.51%
TOL5.27%
SHW4.70%
LOW4.53%
HD4.44%
BLD4.00%
LII3.32%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) currently reports 46 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is DHI (15.08%), PHM (9.21%), LEN (7.65%), with DHI as the largest single weight at 15.08%. Together, the top three holdings account for 31.94%, which represents a dominant share and increases sensitivity to the performance of a narrow leadership group. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 16.26%, WACC is 9.89%, and the economic spread is 6.37%. On balance, the economic spread is positive but compressed — adequate for value preservation, less convincing for aggressive compounding. Supporting metrics show ROE at 26.71% and ROA at 9.48%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

On valuation, the portfolio registers trailing P/E of 14.30, forward P/E of 14.67, PEG of 2.86. The minimal trailing-to-forward compression implies limited earnings growth expectations are embedded in current prices. The PEG ratio is elevated relative to historical norms, implying the market is paying a meaningful premium for the earnings trajectory embedded in analyst estimates. A current ratio of 5.26 across the holding set reflects strong short-term liquidity. Taken together, the multiple and liquidity picture suggests a portfolio that is priced for a constructive outcome — but where execution against earnings estimates will be the key determinant of whether that price is justified.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 27.84%, operating margin at 13.54%, and free cash flow margin at 9.70%. Gross margins are moderate, reflecting industry conditions where input costs weigh more heavily on revenue. At this operating margin level, cost efficiency is present but limited — overhead is a visible drag on earnings conversion. At this FCF margin level, cash conversion is functional without being a standout feature of the portfolio's quality profile. Across the three margin layers, the picture is inconsistent — a reminder that aggregate metrics can mask meaningful variation at the individual holding level.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of -0.91% signaling contraction in aggregate revenues across the portfolio, while the estimated 12-month price change of 22.47%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At -2.5%, the projected 12-month EPS growth is a notable negative — it suggests earnings headwinds are building, a dynamic that usually invites multiple compression rather than expansion. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The balance of evidence suggests a neutral posture is appropriate — there are merits here, but also reasons for caution that limit conviction at current levels.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.