JOET Virtus Terranova US Quality Momentum ETF

Expense Ratio
0.29%
Dividend
0.62%
Previous close
$44.51
Est. 12 months change
+14.41%
Projected Price
$50.93

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
37.01%
Return on Assets (ROA)
9.41%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
30.23%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.63%
ROIC - WACC
20.59%
Updated : 2026-06-09 20:12 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
21.80
Forward P/E
19.41
PEG Ratio
2.74
Debt Current Ratio
1.90

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
49.59%
Operating Margin
21.71%
FCF Margin
20.43%
TTM Revenue Growth
20.69%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
12.37%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
3.73%
Price % from 200 SMA
4.95%
6 Months
5.01%
1 Year
12.30%
2 Years
32.88%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
DVN1.41%
DDOG1.36%
MRVL1.28%
MU1.27%
NTAP1.18%
FSLR1.09%
AMD1.07%
CSCO1.06%
LLY1.00%
WDC0.98%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Virtus Terranova US Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) currently reports 125 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the index-like in breadth range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is DVN (1.41%), DDOG (1.36%), MRVL (1.28%), with DVN as the largest single weight at 1.41%. Together, the top three holdings account for 4.05%, which reflects a construction where the top positions carry meaningful but not outsized influence on aggregate returns. In aggregate, the construction reflects a balance between directional conviction and the diversification benefits that come from a broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On the question of capital productivity, ROIC is 30.23%, WACC is 9.63%, and the economic spread is 20.59%. On balance, the economic spread is positive and meaningful, suggesting the underlying holdings are building rather than eroding intrinsic value. Supporting metrics show ROE at 37.01% and ROA at 9.41%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

Assessed on a multiple basis, trailing P/E of 21.80, forward P/E of 19.41, PEG of 2.74. Forward P/E tracks closely with trailing P/E — a sign that the market sees the current earnings run rate as a reasonable baseline going forward. At this PEG level, the valuation case rests more on quality, scarcity, or market leadership than on earnings growth alone. The portfolio carries an aggregate current ratio of 1.90, consistent with adequate near-term liquidity management. Overall, the valuation setup reads as a balance between expected growth and execution risk, with liquidity acting as an important stabilizer if macro conditions become less favorable.

Margins & Cash Generation

The margin stack reads as follows: gross margin sits at 49.59%, operating margin at 21.71%, and free cash flow margin at 20.43%. The gross margin reading points to holdings with solid but not outsized pricing power relative to direct costs. The portfolio's operating margins are solid, pointing to holdings where overhead management is a relative strength. FCF margins are constructive here, reflecting holdings that generate cash reliably after reinvestment requirements. The margin profile is a mixed read — some holdings are clearly well-run, but the aggregate numbers point to a basket that is not uniformly high-quality.

Growth & Forward Outlook

The forward view combines two signals: the estimated 12-month price change of 14.56%, where analyst assumptions support a moderate upside case if execution remains steady, while TTM revenue growth of 20.69% suggesting the portfolio's businesses are collectively capturing meaningful market share or pricing power. Analyst estimates point to EPS growth of 12.4%, suggesting steady earnings progress that supports the current multiple on a forward basis. One metric reflects operational reality, the other market expectation — both are useful inputs, but neither should be read in isolation. The interaction between revenue execution and analyst repricing will ultimately determine how closely realized returns track current expectations. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

Putting all the pieces together, the fundamental picture is one of the more convincing setups in these metrics — strong capital returns, reasonable pricing, and a healthy forward outlook.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.