LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.53% |
| MSFT | 6.07% |
| GOOG | 5.57% |
| AAPL | 5.15% |
| AMZN | 4.65% |
| META | 3.27% |
| V | 3.17% |
| AVGO | 3.08% |
| SCHW | 1.92% |
| EOG | 1.80% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) currently reports 69 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (7.53%), MSFT (6.07%), GOOG (5.57%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 7.53%. Together, the top three holdings account for 19.17%, which indicates that performance drivers are distributed more evenly across the broader basket. This architecture allows the fund to express a clear investment thesis at the top while relying on the broader basket to manage idiosyncratic volatility.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
From a capital efficiency perspective, ROIC is 33.03%, WACC is 9.44%, and the economic spread is 23.59%. On balance, holdings generate meaningful returns above their cost of capital, a hallmark of competitively advantaged businesses. Supporting metrics show ROE at 39.61% and ROA at 13.29%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.
Valuation
Multiple analysis puts the portfolio at trailing P/E of 25.37, forward P/E of 20.24, PEG of 1.92. Trailing P/E sits modestly above forward P/E, a spread that is consistent with steady earnings progress and limited near-term re-rating potential. On a PEG basis, valuation is in the middle ground — fair for the growth on offer, with the return case resting on earnings delivery rather than re-rating. At 1.66, the aggregate current ratio indicates adequate but not exceptional balance sheet coverage. The combined valuation and liquidity profile points to a portfolio where current prices embed meaningful growth expectations, and where delivery against those expectations will drive the return outcome.
Margins & Cash Generation
On the margin front: gross margin sits at 56.28%, operating margin at 27.23%, and free cash flow margin at 22.19%. At this level, the portfolio reflects reasonable cost discipline and adequate pricing leverage at the production layer. Operating margins sit in a healthy range — not exceptional, but indicating reasonable operational efficiency. Strong free cash flow margins point to businesses with meaningful financial flexibility and limited dependence on external capital. The margin trifecta here — strong at gross, operating, and free cash flow levels — is a hallmark of competitively advantaged businesses.
Growth & Forward Outlook
The two main inputs to the near-term picture — TTM revenue growth of 16.58% reflecting consistent if unspectacular revenue expansion. Consensus EPS estimates point to 25.3% earnings growth over the next 12 months — a compelling near-term earnings catalyst that, if delivered, changes the valuation conversation materially. Analyst price targets suggest street expectations imply a constructive but measured return profile on a 12-month view. Revenue momentum establishes the baseline; analyst price targets reveal how much the market is already paying for future execution on top of that baseline. Delivered returns will ultimately be shaped by the gap — or lack thereof — between operating execution and the expectations embedded in current prices. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
Strong BuyAcross the metrics reviewed, the evidence is consistently constructive — quality, growth, and valuation are pulling in the same direction.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.