OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| SLB | 20.17% |
| BKR | 11.84% |
| HAL | 7.03% |
| FTI | 6.59% |
| TS | 5.17% |
| NE | 4.68% |
| RIG | 4.50% |
| WFRD | 4.44% |
| VAL | 4.02% |
| LBRT | 3.51% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) currently reports 25 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the concentrated range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is SLB (20.17%), BKR (11.84%), HAL (7.03%), with SLB as the largest single weight at 20.17%. Together, the top three holdings account for 39.04%, which signals meaningful concentration at the top of the book, where a small number of names can drive outsized swings in fund performance. This architecture allows the fund to express a clear investment thesis at the top while relying on the broader basket to manage idiosyncratic volatility.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
From a capital efficiency perspective, ROIC is 12.37%, WACC is 8.07%, and the economic spread is 4.30%. On balance, holdings marginally exceed their cost of capital, suggesting modest but present value creation. Supporting metrics show ROE at 12.37% and ROA at 5.64%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.
Valuation
Multiple analysis puts the portfolio at trailing P/E of 17.50, forward P/E of 21.64, PEG of 2.85. Trailing and forward multiples are nearly identical, indicating the market is pricing the portfolio on a relatively static earnings assumption. Growth-adjusted, the portfolio is priced at a premium — a level that demands consistent execution and limits the potential for multiple expansion from here. At 1.94, the aggregate current ratio indicates adequate but not exceptional balance sheet coverage. The combined valuation and liquidity profile points to a portfolio where current prices embed meaningful growth expectations, and where delivery against those expectations will drive the return outcome.
Margins & Cash Generation
On the margin front: gross margin sits at 26.49%, operating margin at 13.51%, and free cash flow margin at 11.16%. At this level, gross margins suggest a more competitive or capital-intensive operating environment across the holdings. The operating margin reading is below average, pointing to businesses where scaling costs remain a challenge. Moderate free cash flow margins suggest holdings that generate cash but rely on continued revenue growth to sustain reinvestment capacity. The margin stack is not uniformly strong, which means the portfolio's earnings resilience under adverse conditions is less certain.
Growth & Forward Outlook
On the forward picture: TTM revenue growth of 6.07% reflecting consistent if unspectacular revenue expansion. Consensus EPS estimates point to a decline of -19.2% over the next 12 months, adding a layer of risk to the forward case and warranting caution on the earnings trajectory. Analyst price targets suggest street estimates suggest current pricing may be ahead of fundamentals on a 12-month view. Revenue growth is grounded in reported results; price targets are forward projections that embed assumptions about multiple expansion, earnings delivery, and macro conditions. The key risk in both directions is whether the underlying businesses can maintain their operating trajectory as macro and sector conditions evolve. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
The composite picture contains enough yellow flags that a cautious approach is warranted, particularly against a backdrop of stretched multiples and uncertain macroeconomic conditions.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.