PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF

Expense Ratio
0.58%
Dividend
0.39%
Previous close
$169.68
Est. 12 months change
+9.67%
Projected Price
$186.09

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
46.55%
Return on Assets (ROA)
5.35%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
15.05%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
8.29%
ROIC - WACC
6.77%
Updated : 2026-04-04 08:29 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
35.21
Forward P/E
29.41
PEG Ratio
3.68
Debt Current Ratio
1.71

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
26.12%
Operating Margin
11.84%
FCF Margin
12.14%
TTM Revenue Growth
19.68%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
19.72%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-3.21%
Price % from 200 SMA
7.64%
6 Months
8.67%
1 Year
42.80%
2 Years
69.90%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
LMT9.76%
RTX9.14%
GE8.04%
BA7.85%
NOC6.63%
GD5.44%
LHX4.71%
HON4.62%
HWM4.44%
PH3.34%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) currently reports 59 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the selectively diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is LMT (9.76%), RTX (9.14%), GE (8.04%), with LMT as the largest single weight at 9.76%. Together, the top three holdings account for 26.94%, which points to a relatively flat weight distribution where no single cluster of names dominates outcomes. The weight distribution suggests a portfolio designed to capture thematic upside while avoiding excessive dependence on any single name outside the largest positions.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Assessing the quality of returns on invested capital, ROIC is 15.05%, WACC is 8.29%, and the economic spread is 6.77%. On balance, the economic spread is thin but positive — the portfolio's businesses are clearing the hurdle, though without significant headroom. Supporting metrics show ROE at 46.55% and ROA at 5.35%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

The current pricing of the underlying holdings reads trailing P/E of 35.21, forward P/E of 29.41, PEG of 3.68. The trailing-to-forward compression is moderate — supportive of valuation, but not a dramatic signal of earnings acceleration. The PEG reading here is above the range most value-oriented investors would find comfortable — the valuation requires a high degree of confidence in forward earnings delivery. The current ratio of 1.71 is in an acceptable range, reflecting reasonable short-term financial health. In aggregate, the valuation reads as fair to moderately stretched — leaving the investment case dependent on earnings execution rather than multiple expansion.

Margins & Cash Generation

Looking at margins from gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 26.12%, operating margin at 11.84%, and free cash flow margin at 12.14%. The gross margin reading is middling — acceptable, but leaving less room for error at the production level. Modest operating margins indicate that while revenues are being generated, converting them to earnings is less efficient. The portfolio's cash conversion is middle-of-the-road — sufficient for operational needs, but leaving limited surplus for discretionary allocation. Together, these margins describe a portfolio where business quality varies — and where macro or sector headwinds could disproportionately impact the weaker-margin holdings.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Projected 12-month EPS growth of 19.7% adds a powerful forward signal — analyst consensus expects earnings to accelerate materially, which, if delivered, could make current multiples look increasingly modest. Turning to growth and analyst expectations, TTM revenue growth of 19.68% pointing to stable operational progress without outsized acceleration, while the estimated 12-month price change of 9.77%, where street expectations indicate a low-ceiling return setup in the near term. The distinction matters: revenue growth tells you what the businesses are doing, price targets tell you what analysts think the market will pay for it. Ultimately, the alignment between revenue momentum and analyst targets will depend on execution quality and the broader rate and sentiment environment. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The fundamental picture is not broken, but neither is it clearly compelling — a hold posture reflects the absence of an obvious catalyst for re-rating in either direction.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.