PRNT 3D Printing ETF

Expense Ratio
0.66%
Dividend
0.66%
Previous close
$26.34
Est. 12 months change
+18.85%
Projected Price
$31.31

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
2.35%
Return on Assets (ROA)
1.49%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
7.55%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
11.13%
ROIC - WACC
-3.58%
Updated : 2026-08-15 06:24 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
21.76
Forward P/E
20.36
PEG Ratio
11.00
Debt Current Ratio
2.79

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
46.92%
Operating Margin
-2.73%
FCF Margin
17.30%
TTM Revenue Growth
16.37%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
6.91%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
7.38%
Price % from 200 SMA
13.68%
6 Months
15.08%
1 Year
19.41%
2 Years
37.84%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
PTC8.54%
ADSK8.16%
DDD7.32%
SNPS7.18%
VELO6.97%
XRAY6.88%
HPQ6.44%
PRLB6.33%
SSYS6.04%
MTLS5.81%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

3D Printing ETF (PRNT) currently reports 29 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the deliberately concentrated range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is PTC (8.54%), ADSK (8.16%), DDD (7.32%), with PTC as the largest single weight at 8.54%. Together, the top three holdings account for 24.02%, which implies a more democratized weight structure where the broader holding set matters as much as the leadership group. This structure gives the portfolio a dual character: meaningful exposure to its highest-conviction names, alongside enough breadth to dampen idiosyncratic noise.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Examining the portfolio through a capital allocation lens, ROIC is 7.55%, WACC is 11.13%, and the economic spread is -3.58%. On balance, the economic spread is negative, indicating that at current return levels, reinvestment is value-destructive in aggregate. Supporting metrics show ROE at 2.35% and ROA at 1.49%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

Valuation currently screens at trailing P/E of 21.76, forward P/E of 20.36, PEG of 11.00. Trailing and forward P/E are close together, implying the market does not expect a significant change in the earnings trajectory over the near term. At this PEG level, the portfolio is priced generously relative to its expected earnings trajectory — execution risk is meaningfully priced in. The aggregate current ratio of 2.79 reflects a holding set with strong liquidity buffers against short-term stress. The valuation profile here is neither obviously cheap nor dramatically expensive — a setup where the return case is built more on earnings delivery than on re-rating potential.

Margins & Cash Generation

From gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 46.92%, operating margin at -2.73%, and free cash flow margin at 17.30%. At this gross margin level, the holdings demonstrate adequate production efficiency without commanding premium pricing. At this level, operating margins signal that earnings quality is limited — a feature of growth-stage or restructuring businesses. The portfolio's FCF margin is above average, pointing to holdings with efficient capital deployment and durable cash generation. The margin profile warrants careful consideration — businesses with compressed margins have less room to absorb cost pressure or revenue softness.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Combining revenue momentum with analyst targets, the estimated 12-month price change of 19.04%, where consensus expectations favor gradual appreciation over the next year, while TTM revenue growth of 16.37% reflecting moderate but reliable revenue progress across the basket. Separating operating reality from market-implied expectations is useful here — they can diverge meaningfully when sentiment shifts. The forward return case hinges on whether the operating reality stays close enough to analyst assumptions for those targets to remain credible. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The composite read is moderately constructive but uneven — in the absence of a clear catalyst, a neutral stance is well-supported by the data.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.