PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| VIAV | 3.98% |
| FORM | 3.89% |
| SMTC | 3.68% |
| SANM | 3.66% |
| DOCN | 3.52% |
| QRVO | 3.38% |
| VSAT | 3.22% |
| PLXS | 2.80% |
| ENPH | 2.56% |
| RAL | 2.43% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) currently reports 70 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the balanced in breadth range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is VIAV (3.98%), FORM (3.89%), SMTC (3.68%), with VIAV as the largest single weight at 3.98%. Together, the top three holdings account for 11.55%, which reflects a construction where the top positions carry meaningful but not outsized influence on aggregate returns. In aggregate, the construction reflects a balance between directional conviction and the diversification benefits that come from a broader holding set.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
On the question of capital productivity, ROIC is 9.29%, WACC is 9.94%, and the economic spread is -0.65%. On balance, the spread between returns and funding costs is negative — a dynamic that pressures intrinsic value unless operating performance improves. Supporting metrics show ROE at 6.37% and ROA at 3.40%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
On a multiple basis, the portfolio trades at trailing P/E of 28.97, forward P/E of 18.99, PEG of 14.61. Forward P/E is below trailing by a moderate margin, pointing to modest earnings expectations that support the current valuation without relying on outsized growth. The PEG reading is high enough to suggest the market is attributing significant optionality or quality premium to the portfolio's underlying businesses. The portfolio's holdings carry a current ratio of 2.67, pointing to strong short-term financial health. The valuation setup is broadly consistent with a market that is pricing growth without being reckless about it — a balanced but not cautious stance.
Margins & Cash Generation
The margin stack reads as follows: gross margin sits at 45.70%, operating margin at 6.03%, and free cash flow margin at 13.90%. The gross margin reading points to holdings with solid but not outsized pricing power relative to direct costs. The portfolio's operating margins leave limited room between gross profit and operating earnings — a sign of cost pressure. FCF margins are in a reasonable range, though there is room for improvement in how efficiently revenues convert to free cash. The margin profile is a mixed read — some holdings are clearly well-run, but the aggregate numbers point to a basket that is not uniformly high-quality.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Where growth and expectations intersect, the estimated 12-month price change of 20.12%, where analyst assumptions support a moderate upside case if execution remains steady, while TTM revenue growth of 14.64% suggesting the portfolio's holdings are growing revenues at a measured, sustainable pace. The projected 12-month EPS growth rate of 52.6% is a standout component of the forward case — meaningful earnings expansion at this scale typically warrants attention from growth-oriented investors. Both signals are useful lenses, but they tend to diverge most sharply near inflection points in both business fundamentals and market sentiment. The durability of both the operating trend and analyst optimism will determine whether the current setup translates into measurable near-term returns. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
HoldThere is enough quality in the profile to avoid outright concern, but not enough uniform strength to take high conviction in a direction. Patience has merit here.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.