PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| MXL | 9.90% |
| AMD | 6.95% |
| MU | 6.16% |
| TXN | 4.52% |
| AVGO | 4.26% |
| KLAC | 3.97% |
| SITM | 3.93% |
| LRCX | 3.92% |
| AMAT | 3.80% |
| NVDA | 3.68% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) currently reports 31 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the mid-range in diversification range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is MXL (9.90%), AMD (6.95%), MU (6.16%), with MXL as the largest single weight at 9.90%. Together, the top three holdings account for 23.01%, which implies a more democratized weight structure where the broader holding set matters as much as the leadership group. This structure gives the portfolio a dual character: meaningful exposure to its highest-conviction names, alongside enough breadth to dampen idiosyncratic noise.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Examining the portfolio through a capital allocation lens, ROIC is 20.76%, WACC is 15.00%, and the economic spread is 5.76%. On balance, holdings are generating returns above their cost of capital, though the margin is slim enough to warrant attention. Supporting metrics show ROE at 18.86% and ROA at 8.66%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.
Valuation
Multiple analysis puts the portfolio at trailing P/E of 59.85, forward P/E of 31.99, PEG of 1.59. The spread from trailing to forward multiple is wide enough to suggest earnings momentum is a meaningful part of the current valuation case. On a PEG basis, valuation is in the middle ground — fair for the growth on offer, with the return case resting on earnings delivery rather than re-rating. The aggregate current ratio of 3.80 reflects a holding set with strong liquidity buffers against short-term stress. The combined valuation and liquidity profile points to a portfolio where current prices embed meaningful growth expectations, and where delivery against those expectations will drive the return outcome.
Margins & Cash Generation
From gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 51.80%, operating margin at 18.89%, and free cash flow margin at 17.83%. At this gross margin level, the holdings demonstrate adequate production efficiency without commanding premium pricing. The operating margin reading is healthy — adequate to support reinvestment without sacrificing profitability. The portfolio's FCF margin is above average, pointing to holdings with efficient capital deployment and durable cash generation. The margin profile warrants careful consideration — businesses with compressed margins have less room to absorb cost pressure or revenue softness.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Revenue momentum and analyst targets together paint a picture where the estimated 12-month price change of -11.96%, where consensus forward pricing suggests a pullback from current levels, while TTM revenue growth of 40.72% reflecting top-line acceleration that, if sustained, supports the forward earnings case. Reported revenue growth is the operational foundation; the analyst target spread shows what the market is willing to pay above it — and that premium can evaporate quickly if delivery slips. For investors, the central question is whether the operating momentum visible in revenues is durable enough to support the price appreciation implied by consensus targets. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
BuyThe fundamental case holds up across most key dimensions — the combination of positive economic spread, reasonable valuation, and analyst support is constructive.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.