QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund

Expense Ratio
0.08%
Dividend
1.51%
Previous close
$76.38
Est. 12 months change
+14.42%
Projected Price
$87.40

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
45.02%
Return on Assets (ROA)
13.21%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
32.16%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
7.88%
ROIC - WACC
24.27%
Updated : 2026-05-25 20:56 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
21.50
Forward P/E
19.37
PEG Ratio
2.54
Debt Current Ratio
1.44

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
55.23%
Operating Margin
29.15%
FCF Margin
24.02%
TTM Revenue Growth
16.13%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
11.02%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
3.76%
Price % from 200 SMA
5.29%
6 Months
6.77%
1 Year
15.29%
2 Years
24.35%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NVDA7.01%
AAPL5.82%
MSFT5.55%
JNJ4.14%
XOM2.56%
PG2.18%
COST2.17%
ABBV2.16%
GOOGL2.16%
V2.13%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) currently reports 113 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the broadly constructed range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (7.01%), AAPL (5.82%), MSFT (5.55%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 7.01%. Together, the top three holdings account for 18.38%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 32.16%, WACC is 7.88%, and the economic spread is 24.27%. On balance, returns on invested capital exceed the cost of funding by a comfortable margin, which over time compounds favorably for long-term holders. Supporting metrics show ROE at 45.02% and ROA at 13.21%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

From a pricing standpoint, the portfolio sits at trailing P/E of 21.50, forward P/E of 19.37, PEG of 2.54. The narrow spread between trailing and forward multiples implies earnings expectations are relatively stable — the portfolio is not being priced for an earnings inflection. A PEG above 2.5 implies investors are paying well above fair value for the growth embedded in estimates — a setup that typically leaves little room for earnings disappointment. A current ratio reading of 1.44 suggests the portfolio's holdings carry less short-term financial cushion than the broader market average. In total, the multiple and liquidity readings describe a portfolio where valuation is a secondary risk relative to earnings delivery — the numbers are defensible if estimates hold.

Margins & Cash Generation

Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 55.23%, operating margin at 29.15%, and free cash flow margin at 24.02%. Gross margins sit in a healthy range, consistent with businesses that manage input costs effectively. Operating margins are in good shape, consistent with businesses that maintain reasonable earnings conversion after overhead. At this level, free cash flow margins suggest businesses that are building financial strength alongside revenue growth. Read together, these margins describe businesses that have earned their profitability rather than manufactured it through accounting — a meaningful quality signal.

Growth & Forward Outlook

On a forward-looking basis, TTM revenue growth of 16.13% a signal of steady demand without the volatility of high-growth names, while the estimated 12-month price change of 14.57%, where the target distribution indicates incremental upside rather than outsized repricing. Revenue growth and price targets are correlated but not the same — strong operations do not always translate to strong price appreciation, and vice versa. The forward return case rests on whether the businesses can sustain their operating trajectory long enough for analyst price targets to be reached or exceeded. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Balancing the strengths against the areas of uncertainty, the weight of evidence favors an optimistic view with appropriate risk awareness.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.