QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF

Expense Ratio
0.28%
Previous close
$76.40
Est. 12 months change
+23.01%
Projected Price
$93.98

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
-1.34%
Return on Assets (ROA)
1.53%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
4.12%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.81%
ROIC - WACC
-5.70%
Updated : 2026-08-04 19:28 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
26.94
Forward P/E
17.10
PEG Ratio
1.25
Debt Current Ratio
3.15

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
32.37%
Operating Margin
-330.58%
FCF Margin
13.07%
TTM Revenue Growth
30.86%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
57.52%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-0.79%
Price % from 200 SMA
7.00%
6 Months
13.19%
1 Year
19.38%
2 Years
36.16%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
AGX2.26%
PBF2.22%
MTZ2.17%
POWL2.16%
DY2.15%
SANM2.15%
NVT2.10%
LFUS2.10%
MTSI2.08%
DELL2.08%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) currently reports 51 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the balanced in breadth range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is AGX (2.26%), PBF (2.22%), MTZ (2.17%), with AGX as the largest single weight at 2.26%. Together, the top three holdings account for 6.65%, which reflects a construction where the top positions carry meaningful but not outsized influence on aggregate returns. In aggregate, the construction reflects a balance between directional conviction and the diversification benefits that come from a broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On the question of capital productivity, ROIC is 4.12%, WACC is 9.81%, and the economic spread is -5.70%. On balance, the spread between returns and funding costs is negative — a dynamic that pressures intrinsic value unless operating performance improves. Supporting metrics show ROE at -1.34% and ROA at 1.53%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

On a multiple basis, the portfolio trades at trailing P/E of 26.94, forward P/E of 17.10, PEG of 1.25. Forward P/E is below trailing by a moderate margin, pointing to modest earnings expectations that support the current valuation without relying on outsized growth. The PEG reading here is low enough to suggest investors are not being asked to overpay for the growth embedded in analyst estimates. The portfolio's holdings carry a current ratio of 3.15, pointing to strong short-term financial health. The valuation setup is broadly consistent with a market that is pricing growth without being reckless about it — a balanced but not cautious stance.

Margins & Cash Generation

The margin stack reads as follows: gross margin sits at 32.37%, operating margin at -330.58%, and free cash flow margin at 13.07%. Gross margins are in the moderate range, typical of sectors where direct costs consume a larger share of revenue. Operating margins this compressed indicate businesses where the path to earnings remains dependent on future scale. FCF margins are in a reasonable range, though there is room for improvement in how efficiently revenues convert to free cash. The margin profile is a mixed read — some holdings are clearly well-run, but the aggregate numbers point to a basket that is not uniformly high-quality.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Where growth and expectations intersect, the estimated 12-month price change of 23.24%, where analyst assumptions support a moderate upside case if execution remains steady, while TTM revenue growth of 30.86% suggesting the portfolio's businesses are collectively capturing meaningful market share or pricing power. The projected 12-month EPS growth rate of 57.5% is a standout component of the forward case — meaningful earnings expansion at this scale typically warrants attention from growth-oriented investors. Both signals are useful lenses, but they tend to diverge most sharply near inflection points in both business fundamentals and market sentiment. The durability of both the operating trend and analyst optimism will determine whether the current setup translates into measurable near-term returns. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

The overall evidence base is constructive, with more signals pointing up than down and no obvious structural impairment to the forward case.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.