RFV Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| PBF | 3.36% |
| AVT | 3.03% |
| ARW | 2.95% |
| OLN | 2.46% |
| DINO | 2.42% |
| LEA | 2.26% |
| BHF | 2.00% |
| CHRD | 1.98% |
| SNX | 1.93% |
| CNXC | 1.93% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) currently reports 98 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately spread range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is PBF (3.36%), AVT (3.03%), ARW (2.95%), with PBF as the largest single weight at 3.36%. Together, the top three holdings account for 9.34%, which does not represent a dominant share, indicating less concentration in the very top of the book. The overall construction balances concentrated exposure at the top with broader diversification through the rest of the book.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Through the lens of capital efficiency, ROIC is 5.99%, WACC is 6.94%, and the economic spread is -0.95%. On balance, the gap between operating returns and funding costs is unfavorable — a structural challenge that typically weighs on intrinsic value over time. Supporting metrics show ROE at 6.69% and ROA at 3.23%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
From a market pricing perspective, trailing P/E of 14.78, forward P/E of 9.89, PEG of 2.14. With trailing and forward P/E closely aligned, the market appears to be pricing the portfolio on the assumption that earnings remain broadly stable near term. On a growth-adjusted basis, valuation appears reasonable relative to expected growth. The portfolio's weighted current ratio of 1.75 reflects adequate near-term financial stability. The overall valuation picture is one where the market is paying for a specific earnings and growth outcome — and where any deviation from that path would likely pressure multiples.
Margins & Cash Generation
The margin profile breaks down as follows: gross margin sits at 24.96%, operating margin at 10.38%, and free cash flow margin at 9.22%. The gross margin profile here is adequate rather than impressive, consistent with more competitively priced industries. Operating margins are modest, suggesting overhead costs are consuming a meaningful share of gross profit. The portfolio's FCF margin is adequate — cash generation is present, but capital expenditure needs absorb a notable portion of earnings. The mixed margin profile here calls for selectivity — the portfolio's quality of earnings is not uniform across the holding set.
Growth & Forward Outlook
The near-term directional case rests on two inputs: TTM revenue growth of 11.15% pointing to reasonable revenue execution across the underlying holdings. In parallel, analysts project moderate appreciation over the next 12 months based on current consensus targets. The two figures measure different things — one reflects what businesses are actually delivering, the other what the market expects them to deliver. The extent to which these signals converge or diverge will likely be a primary driver of realized returns relative to current expectations. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
BuyThe data points reviewed collectively point toward a positive outcome if execution holds — the setup is favorable even accounting for the inherent uncertainty in forward estimates.
This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.