RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Expense Ratio
0.2%
Dividend
1.61%
Previous close
$193.09
Est. 12 months change
+17.72%
Projected Price
$227.30

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
26.17%
Return on Assets (ROA)
7.02%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
16.69%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
8.24%
ROIC - WACC
8.45%
Updated : 2026-04-03 19:49 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
21.65
Forward P/E
16.78
PEG Ratio
2.60
Debt Current Ratio
1.56

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
46.81%
Operating Margin
20.52%
FCF Margin
18.03%
TTM Revenue Growth
11.28%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
28.98%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-2.60%
Price % from 200 SMA
1.19%
6 Months
1.32%
1 Year
10.43%
2 Years
15.68%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
APA0.26%
DOW0.25%
LYB0.24%
OXY0.24%
COP0.23%
XOM0.23%
DAL0.23%
FANG0.23%
CIEN0.23%
CTRA0.23%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) currently reports 501 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the expansively diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is APA (0.26%), DOW (0.25%), LYB (0.24%), with APA as the largest single weight at 0.26%. Together, the top three holdings account for 0.75%, which indicates that idiosyncratic risk at the top of the book is relatively contained within the overall portfolio. The resulting profile combines thematic conviction with varying degrees of diversification, which can support upside participation while still spreading idiosyncratic risk beyond the top weights.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

From a returns-on-capital standpoint, ROIC is 16.69%, WACC is 8.24%, and the economic spread is 8.45%. On balance, the portfolio clears its capital cost hurdle modestly — value creation is present but not emphatic. Supporting metrics show ROE at 26.17% and ROA at 7.02%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

The market currently prices the portfolio at trailing P/E of 21.65, forward P/E of 16.78, PEG of 2.60. The gap between P/E and forward P/E is small, suggesting the valuation is not contingent on a near-term earnings step-change. The PEG ratio signals premium pricing — the portfolio's earnings growth expectations, while present, do not fully explain the current multiple on a purely quantitative basis. The aggregate current ratio of 1.56 points to adequate liquidity across holdings. Valuation and liquidity together frame a portfolio where the price paid today is a reasonable bet on earnings delivery — but not a margin-of-safety purchase at current levels.

Margins & Cash Generation

On profitability at each income statement layer, gross margin sits at 46.81%, operating margin at 20.52%, and free cash flow margin at 18.03%. The portfolio's gross margins are solid, reflecting a reasonable balance between revenue realization and direct cost absorption. At this operating margin level, the holdings demonstrate competent cost management and reasonable earnings durability. Free cash flow margins are strong, reflecting capital-efficient businesses that largely self-fund their growth. Taken together, the margin stack suggests quality that is uneven — some layers are more resilient than others, and that asymmetry matters under stress.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Looking at growth and market-implied direction, TTM revenue growth of 11.28% indicating top-line growth that is constructive without being speculative. At the same time, the estimated 12-month price change of 17.90%, where implied upside appears constructive but not aggressive. It's worth distinguishing between what businesses are actually delivering and what the market is being asked to believe about the next 12 months. Maintaining alignment between reported results and forward estimates is particularly important in periods where macro uncertainty is elevated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Putting the pieces together, this is a profile with genuine merit: the numbers support confidence in the forward case without requiring heroic assumptions.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.