RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| INTC | 2.19% |
| AMD | 2.18% |
| MU | 2.17% |
| WDC | 2.15% |
| TER | 2.10% |
| LRCX | 1.99% |
| AMAT | 1.94% |
| STX | 1.79% |
| FSLR | 1.77% |
| DELL | 1.76% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) currently reports 68 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the selectively diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is INTC (2.19%), AMD (2.18%), MU (2.17%), with INTC as the largest single weight at 2.19%. Together, the top three holdings account for 6.54%, which points to a relatively flat weight distribution where no single cluster of names dominates outcomes. The weight distribution suggests a portfolio designed to capture thematic upside while avoiding excessive dependence on any single name outside the largest positions.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Assessing the quality of returns on invested capital, ROIC is 28.98%, WACC is 10.69%, and the economic spread is 18.29%. On balance, the portfolio's businesses are clearing their capital cost hurdle with room to spare. Supporting metrics show ROE at 37.36% and ROA at 10.26%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.
Valuation
The market currently prices the portfolio at trailing P/E of 29.08, forward P/E of 18.05, PEG of 1.63. Trailing P/E is materially above forward P/E — a spread that typically signals expected earnings growth and a portfolio that is cheaper on a forward basis than it first appears. The PEG ratio is consistent with a portfolio that is reasonably valued on a growth basis — not cheap, but not obviously expensive either. The current ratio of 1.94 is in an acceptable range, reflecting reasonable short-term financial health. Valuation and liquidity together frame a portfolio where the price paid today is a reasonable bet on earnings delivery — but not a margin-of-safety purchase at current levels.
Margins & Cash Generation
Looking at margins from gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 57.63%, operating margin at 23.96%, and free cash flow margin at 25.42%. Gross margins are constructive — not exceptional, but indicative of businesses with reasonable unit economics. At this level, operating margins reflect businesses that are scaling with discipline without dramatic cost pressure. Outstanding free cash flow margins signal businesses that convert revenues into cash at rates that support both reinvestment and shareholder returns. All three margin layers are constructive, pointing to a portfolio where quality of earnings is high and cash generation is reliable.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Projected 12-month EPS growth of 61.1% adds a powerful forward signal — analyst consensus expects earnings to accelerate materially, which, if delivered, could make current multiples look increasingly modest. Zooming out from the valuation discussion, TTM revenue growth of 24.04% pointing to sustained and broad-based revenue growth within the basket, while the estimated 12-month price change of 26.41%, where target prices point to mid-range appreciation potential from current levels. Anchoring to reported revenues provides discipline; analyst price targets add context about how the market currently values that operating reality. The path to realizing analyst-implied returns runs through revenue execution, margin stability, and a macro environment that doesn't undermine either. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
Strong BuyThe quantitative profile, taken as a whole, is above average on virtually every dimension that matters for long-term return generation.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.