SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF

Expense Ratio
0.5%
Previous close
$58.30
Est. 12 months change
+93.31%
Projected Price
$112.71

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
-51.01%
Return on Assets (ROA)
-18.98%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
-61.37%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
7.97%
ROIC - WACC
-69.34%
Updated : 2026-09-30 17:53 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
4.00
Forward P/E
22.54
PEG Ratio
1.04
Debt Current Ratio
15.88

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
26.70%
Operating Margin
-10879.51%
FCF Margin
16.71%
TTM Revenue Growth
56.83%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
-82.25%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
CGON3.81%
ORKA3.59%
TVTX3.59%
DNTH3.17%
MANE3.12%
DFTX3.11%
EWTX2.74%
RLAY2.46%
AMLX2.38%
XENE2.29%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) currently reports 100 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the neither concentrated nor index-like range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is CGON (3.81%), ORKA (3.59%), TVTX (3.59%), with CGON as the largest single weight at 3.81%. Together, the top three holdings account for 10.99%, which indicates that idiosyncratic risk at the top of the book is relatively contained within the overall portfolio. The resulting profile combines thematic conviction with varying degrees of diversification, which can support upside participation while still spreading idiosyncratic risk beyond the top weights.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

From a returns-on-capital standpoint, ROIC is -61.37%, WACC is 7.97%, and the economic spread is -69.34%. On balance, ROIC falls short of WACC, meaning the portfolio's holdings are not yet generating returns sufficient to cover their cost of capital. Supporting metrics show ROE at -51.01% and ROA at -18.98%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

The portfolio's current market valuation reflects trailing P/E of 4.00, forward P/E of 22.54, PEG of 1.04. The trailing-to-forward compression is minimal, consistent with a market that sees limited earnings acceleration from current levels. On a PEG basis, the portfolio screens as attractively priced relative to its expected earnings growth. The aggregate current ratio of 15.88 points to strong liquidity across holdings. Across multiples and liquidity, the portfolio is priced in a way that reflects current expectations reasonably well — leaving limited room for error, but also limited near-term downside from valuation compression alone.

Margins & Cash Generation

On profitability at each income statement layer, gross margin sits at 26.70%, operating margin at -10879.51%, and free cash flow margin at 16.71%. Gross margins are moderate, pointing to holdings where unit economics are functional but not a source of structural advantage. Operating margins are negligible or negative, which is typical of portfolios with heavy exposure to businesses still building toward profitability. Free cash flow margins are strong, reflecting capital-efficient businesses that largely self-fund their growth. Taken together, the margin stack suggests quality that is uneven — some layers are more resilient than others, and that asymmetry matters under stress.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Looking at what the businesses are actually delivering versus what analysts are pricing in, TTM revenue growth of 56.83% indicating that revenue growth remains a meaningful tailwind for the portfolio. At the same time, the estimated 12-month price change of 94.25%, where target-based upside appears notably strong in the current setup. Revenue growth captures operating momentum, while price targets reflect external expectations that can move with rates, risk appetite, and sector sentiment. Whether current momentum translates into delivered returns will depend on the durability of both top-line trends and the assumptions embedded in analyst targets. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The metrics do not present an obvious case for aggressive action in either direction, and a measured, monitoring posture is appropriate given the current mix of signals.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.