SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF

Expense Ratio
0.19%
Dividend
0.29%
Previous close
$99.29
Est. 12 months change
+16.91%
Projected Price
$116.08

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
43.02%
Return on Assets (ROA)
17.54%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
43.05%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
14.43%
ROIC - WACC
28.62%
Updated : 2026-07-04 05:53 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
46.94
Forward P/E
24.57
PEG Ratio
1.42
Debt Current Ratio
3.32

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
60.13%
Operating Margin
35.38%
FCF Margin
28.78%
TTM Revenue Growth
63.97%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
91.09%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
2.37%
Price % from 200 SMA
45.46%
6 Months
71.22%
1 Year
124.84%
2 Years
127.31%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NVDA10.47%
MU8.91%
AVGO7.87%
AMAT5.83%
KLAC5.47%
MRVL5.12%
LRCX4.88%
ASML4.41%
INTC4.34%
TSM4.11%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) currently reports 31 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately broad range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (10.47%), MU (8.91%), AVGO (7.87%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 10.47%. Together, the top three holdings account for 27.25%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 43.05%, WACC is 14.43%, and the economic spread is 28.62%. On balance, holdings are earning returns on capital well in excess of what investors and creditors require — the defining characteristic of a high-quality compounding portfolio. Supporting metrics show ROE at 43.02% and ROA at 17.54%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

On valuation, the portfolio registers trailing P/E of 46.94, forward P/E of 24.57, PEG of 1.42. Forward P/E is considerably lower than trailing, which indicates earnings estimates are pointing higher — a dynamic that makes current prices look more reasonable on a prospective basis. The PEG reading suggests the market is pricing growth conservatively — a dynamic that can be favorable if earnings estimates prove accurate. A current ratio reading of 3.32 suggests the portfolio's businesses are well-capitalized for near-term needs. Taken together, the multiple and liquidity picture suggests a portfolio that is priced for a constructive outcome — but where execution against earnings estimates will be the key determinant of whether that price is justified.

Margins & Cash Generation

Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 60.13%, operating margin at 35.38%, and free cash flow margin at 28.78%. The gross margin reading is exceptional — a reliable indicator of competitively advantaged businesses. Operating margins this strong typically indicate a combination of pricing power, cost discipline, and operating leverage. Free cash flow conversion is exceptional, indicating holdings that are self-funding and cash-generative well above average. Read together, these margins describe businesses that have earned their profitability rather than manufactured it through accounting — a meaningful quality signal.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Two key indicators frame the near-term view: TTM revenue growth of 63.97% a signal of strong operational momentum across the holding set, while the estimated 12-month price change of 17.08%, where the target distribution indicates incremental upside rather than outsized repricing. The near-term return case is built on whether reported trends and analyst projections can remain close enough to make current prices look justified. Whether the setup resolves positively or negatively will depend as much on the macro backdrop as on the capacity of the underlying businesses to deliver against current estimates. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

The full scorecard here is hard to argue with: capital efficiency is strong, margins are healthy, and growth is being priced constructively.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.