SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| COST | 5.10% |
| V | 4.63% |
| MA | 4.63% |
| AAPL | 4.55% |
| GE | 4.39% |
| PG | 3.67% |
| LRCX | 3.66% |
| KO | 3.48% |
| MRK | 3.41% |
| CAT | 3.25% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) currently reports 100 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the mid-range in diversification range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is COST (5.10%), V (4.63%), MA (4.63%), with COST as the largest single weight at 5.10%. Together, the top three holdings account for 14.36%, which implies a more democratized weight structure where the broader holding set matters as much as the leadership group. This structure gives the portfolio a dual character: meaningful exposure to its highest-conviction names, alongside enough breadth to dampen idiosyncratic noise.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Examining the portfolio through a capital allocation lens, ROIC is 39.59%, WACC is 9.38%, and the economic spread is 30.20%. On balance, the economic spread here is exceptional — few portfolios sustain this kind of gap between operating returns and cost of capital. Supporting metrics show ROE at 62.53% and ROA at 12.77%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.
Valuation
Turning to how the market is pricing the underlying earnings, trailing P/E of 26.09, forward P/E of 22.16, PEG of 2.43. Trailing and forward valuations are closely aligned, pointing to a market that is pricing continuity rather than improvement in the earnings outlook. A PEG in this range suggests valuation is fair rather than compelling — the portfolio is priced adequately for its growth, with limited buffer for downside revisions. The aggregate current ratio of 1.49 reflects tighter near-term liquidity — a factor worth monitoring if macro conditions tighten. The combined picture across P/E, forward P/E, PEG, and current ratio suggests a portfolio that is priced for continued execution — where disappointment would be costly and outperformance would likely require positive earnings surprises.
Margins & Cash Generation
From gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 52.14%, operating margin at 28.30%, and free cash flow margin at 22.69%. At this gross margin level, the holdings demonstrate adequate production efficiency without commanding premium pricing. The operating margin reading is healthy — adequate to support reinvestment without sacrificing profitability. The portfolio's FCF margin is above average, pointing to holdings with efficient capital deployment and durable cash generation. Taken together, the margin profile reflects a collection of businesses with genuine competitive advantages — capable of sustaining profitability and generating cash across a range of economic conditions.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Revenue momentum and analyst targets together paint a picture where the estimated 12-month price change of 14.49%, where consensus expectations favor gradual appreciation over the next year, while TTM revenue growth of 10.45% reflecting moderate but reliable revenue progress across the basket. Reported revenue growth is the operational foundation; the analyst target spread shows what the market is willing to pay above it — and that premium can evaporate quickly if delivery slips. For investors, the central question is whether the operating momentum visible in revenues is durable enough to support the price appreciation implied by consensus targets. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
BuyThe fundamental case holds up across most key dimensions — the combination of positive economic spread, reasonable valuation, and analyst support is constructive.
This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.