XAR State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

Expense Ratio
0.35%
Dividend
0.34%
Previous close
$259.58
Est. 12 months change
+17.76%
Projected Price
$305.68

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
27.30%
Return on Assets (ROA)
3.66%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
8.05%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.46%
ROIC - WACC
-1.42%
Updated : 2026-04-04 05:46 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
42.20
Forward P/E
32.76
PEG Ratio
2.68
Debt Current Ratio
3.20

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
26.52%
Operating Margin
1.88%
FCF Margin
9.71%
TTM Revenue Growth
28.99%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
28.81%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-4.85%
Price % from 200 SMA
7.65%
6 Months
9.02%
1 Year
57.78%
2 Years
89.46%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
BWXT3.62%
CW3.36%
GD3.31%
CRS3.31%
HXL3.25%
WWD3.25%
LHX3.24%
BA3.23%
FTAI3.20%
ATI3.20%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) currently reports 40 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately broad range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is BWXT (3.62%), CW (3.36%), GD (3.31%), with BWXT as the largest single weight at 3.62%. Together, the top three holdings account for 10.29%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 8.05%, WACC is 9.46%, and the economic spread is -1.42%. On balance, capital is being deployed at rates below what debt and equity holders require, a headwind to long-term value creation if sustained. Supporting metrics show ROE at 27.30% and ROA at 3.66%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

On valuation, the portfolio registers trailing P/E of 42.20, forward P/E of 32.76, PEG of 2.68. The spread between the two P/E figures is moderate, suggesting earnings are expected to improve gradually rather than accelerate sharply. The PEG ratio is elevated relative to historical norms, implying the market is paying a meaningful premium for the earnings trajectory embedded in analyst estimates. A current ratio reading of 3.20 suggests the portfolio's businesses are well-capitalized for near-term needs. Taken together, the multiple and liquidity picture suggests a portfolio that is priced for a constructive outcome — but where execution against earnings estimates will be the key determinant of whether that price is justified.

Margins & Cash Generation

Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 26.52%, operating margin at 1.88%, and free cash flow margin at 9.71%. The portfolio's gross margins reflect businesses operating in environments with meaningful cost pressure at the production layer. The portfolio's operating margins are minimal, reflecting a holding set where overhead costs are not yet well absorbed by revenues. At this level, free cash flow generation is present but not a defining strength of the portfolio's underlying businesses. Read together, these margin levels suggest a portfolio where earnings durability is present in parts but not consistent across the full holding set.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Two key indicators frame the near-term view: TTM revenue growth of 28.99% a signal of strong operational momentum across the holding set, while the estimated 12-month price change of 17.94%, where the target distribution indicates incremental upside rather than outsized repricing. The near-term return case is built on whether reported trends and analyst projections can remain close enough to make current prices look justified. Whether the setup resolves positively or negatively will depend as much on the macro backdrop as on the capacity of the underlying businesses to deliver against current estimates. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Balancing the strengths against the areas of uncertainty, the weight of evidence favors an optimistic view with appropriate risk awareness.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.