XBI State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| APLS | 1.82% |
| ALKS | 1.41% |
| TGTX | 1.37% |
| MDGL | 1.35% |
| SRRK | 1.30% |
| INSM | 1.29% |
| APGE | 1.25% |
| ARWR | 1.24% |
| TWST | 1.23% |
| PTCT | 1.22% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) currently reports 146 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the broadly constructed range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is APLS (1.82%), ALKS (1.41%), TGTX (1.37%), with APLS as the largest single weight at 1.82%. Together, the top three holdings account for 4.60%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is -23.25%, WACC is 6.72%, and the economic spread is -29.97%. On balance, capital is being deployed at rates below what debt and equity holders require, a headwind to long-term value creation if sustained. Supporting metrics show ROE at -39.17% and ROA at -13.88%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 17.71, forward P/E of 17.20, PEG of 1.28. The gap between trailing and forward multiples is not especially wide, suggesting the market is pricing a steadier earnings path rather than a sharp near-term re-rating. At this PEG level, growth-adjusted valuation looks attractive — the market appears to be paying a reasonable price for the earnings growth embedded in estimates. A current ratio reading of 8.03 suggests the portfolio's businesses are well-capitalized for near-term needs. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.
Margins & Cash Generation
Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 49.44%, operating margin at -89.94%, and free cash flow margin at 26.82%. Gross margins sit in a healthy range, consistent with businesses that manage input costs effectively. The portfolio's operating margins are minimal, reflecting a holding set where overhead costs are not yet well absorbed by revenues. Free cash flow conversion is exceptional, indicating holdings that are self-funding and cash-generative well above average. Read together, these margin levels suggest a portfolio where earnings durability is present in parts but not consistent across the full holding set.
Growth & Forward Outlook
On a forward-looking basis, TTM revenue growth of 63.57% a signal of strong operational momentum across the holding set, while the estimated 12-month price change of 52.96%, where consensus pricing assumptions suggest sizable appreciation potential. Revenue growth and price targets are correlated but not the same — strong operations do not always translate to strong price appreciation, and vice versa. The forward return case rests on whether the businesses can sustain their operating trajectory long enough for analyst price targets to be reached or exceeded. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
BuyBalancing the strengths against the areas of uncertainty, the weight of evidence favors an optimistic view with appropriate risk awareness.
The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.