XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Expense Ratio
0.08%
Dividend
0.42%
Previous close
$180.34
Est. 12 months change
+12.14%
Projected Price
$202.23

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
60.43%
Return on Assets (ROA)
19.45%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
53.76%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
12.42%
ROIC - WACC
41.34%
Updated : 2026-05-22 16:15 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
38.33
Forward P/E
24.08
PEG Ratio
1.63
Debt Current Ratio
2.23

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
61.11%
Operating Margin
35.40%
FCF Margin
30.49%
TTM Revenue Growth
45.90%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
59.18%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
17.47%
Price % from 200 SMA
24.98%
6 Months
32.07%
1 Year
57.33%
2 Years
67.71%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NVDA14.95%
AAPL12.21%
MSFT8.59%
MU5.52%
AVGO5.45%
AMD4.89%
INTC3.75%
CSCO3.03%
LRCX2.44%
AMAT2.26%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) currently reports 72 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (14.95%), AAPL (12.21%), MSFT (8.59%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 14.95%. Together, the top three holdings account for 35.75%, which represents a dominant share and increases sensitivity to the performance of a narrow leadership group. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 53.76%, WACC is 12.42%, and the economic spread is 41.34%. On balance, the portfolio's businesses are compounding at rates that meaningfully exceed what capital costs would otherwise allow. Supporting metrics show ROE at 60.43% and ROA at 19.45%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 38.33, forward P/E of 24.08, PEG of 1.63. Forward P/E sits materially below trailing P/E, which supports the view that earnings expectations are improving and the basket looks cheaper on forward numbers. The PEG ratio sits in a range that most investors would consider fair — neither cheap nor obviously stretched relative to anticipated earnings. A current ratio of 2.23 suggests the holdings have sufficient short-term liquidity without excess. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 61.11%, operating margin at 35.40%, and free cash flow margin at 30.49%. Gross margins are exceptional, reflecting strong pricing power and a defensible cost structure. At this operating margin level, the portfolio's holdings demonstrate strong operational discipline and meaningful earnings leverage. The portfolio's free cash flow margin is exceptional, pointing to capital-light businesses with strong reinvestment optionality. Together, these margin readings describe a portfolio of businesses that protect profitability at every layer of the income statement.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of 45.90% indicating strong organic momentum at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 12.26%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At 59.2%, the projected 12-month EPS growth rate is strong enough to be a primary driver of the forward investment case rather than a peripheral supporting detail. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

The aggregate picture across capital efficiency, valuation, growth, and cash generation builds a compelling case.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.