XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Expense Ratio
0.08%
Dividend
0.56%
Previous close
$135.99
Est. 12 months change
+30.42%
Projected Price
$177.37

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
60.71%
Return on Assets (ROA)
18.97%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
57.17%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
11.79%
ROIC - WACC
45.38%
Updated : 2026-04-03 16:11 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
33.18
Forward P/E
20.20
PEG Ratio
1.59
Debt Current Ratio
2.26

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
61.00%
Operating Margin
34.79%
FCF Margin
30.52%
TTM Revenue Growth
35.36%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
64.27%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-2.58%
Price % from 200 SMA
-1.79%
6 Months
-4.96%
1 Year
29.80%
2 Years
31.49%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NVDA15.41%
AAPL13.54%
MSFT9.89%
AVGO5.37%
MU3.64%
AMD3.01%
PLTR2.94%
CSCO2.69%
AMAT2.46%
LRCX2.43%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) currently reports 72 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NVDA (15.41%), AAPL (13.54%), MSFT (9.89%), with NVDA as the largest single weight at 15.41%. Together, the top three holdings account for 38.84%, which represents a dominant share and increases sensitivity to the performance of a narrow leadership group. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 57.17%, WACC is 11.79%, and the economic spread is 45.38%. On balance, the portfolio's businesses are compounding at rates that meaningfully exceed what capital costs would otherwise allow. Supporting metrics show ROE at 60.71% and ROA at 18.97%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 33.18, forward P/E of 20.20, PEG of 1.59. Forward P/E sits materially below trailing P/E, which supports the view that earnings expectations are improving and the basket looks cheaper on forward numbers. The PEG ratio sits in a range that most investors would consider fair — neither cheap nor obviously stretched relative to anticipated earnings. A current ratio of 2.26 suggests the holdings have sufficient short-term liquidity without excess. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 61.00%, operating margin at 34.79%, and free cash flow margin at 30.52%. Gross margins are exceptional, reflecting strong pricing power and a defensible cost structure. At this operating margin level, the portfolio's holdings demonstrate strong operational discipline and meaningful earnings leverage. The portfolio's free cash flow margin is exceptional, pointing to capital-light businesses with strong reinvestment optionality. Together, these margin readings describe a portfolio of businesses that protect profitability at every layer of the income statement.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of 35.36% indicating strong organic momentum at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 30.73%, where consensus targets imply substantial appreciation potential over the next 12 months. At 64.3%, the projected 12-month EPS growth rate is strong enough to be a primary driver of the forward investment case rather than a peripheral supporting detail. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

The aggregate picture across capital efficiency, valuation, growth, and cash generation builds a compelling case.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.