XLRE State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF

Expense Ratio
0.08%
Dividend
3.17%
Previous close
$44.21
Est. 12 months change
+8.85%
Projected Price
$48.12

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
14.66%
Return on Assets (ROA)
3.16%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
4.94%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
7.99%
ROIC - WACC
-3.04%
Updated : 2026-05-13 19:27 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
32.71
Forward P/E
29.29
PEG Ratio
10.52
Debt Current Ratio
1.19

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
61.65%
Operating Margin
29.95%
FCF Margin
2.83%
TTM Revenue Growth
11.75%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
11.65%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
3.20%
Price % from 200 SMA
5.54%
6 Months
8.28%
1 Year
7.59%
2 Years
16.62%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
WELL10.12%
PLD9.01%
EQIX7.14%
AMT5.73%
DLR4.62%
SPG4.55%
CBRE4.46%
PSA4.42%
VTR4.30%
CCI4.15%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLRE) currently reports 32 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately broad range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is WELL (10.12%), PLD (9.01%), EQIX (7.14%), with WELL as the largest single weight at 10.12%. Together, the top three holdings account for 26.27%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 4.94%, WACC is 7.99%, and the economic spread is -3.04%. On balance, capital is being deployed at rates below what debt and equity holders require, a headwind to long-term value creation if sustained. Supporting metrics show ROE at 14.66% and ROA at 3.16%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

From a pricing standpoint, the portfolio sits at trailing P/E of 32.71, forward P/E of 29.29, PEG of 10.52. The narrow spread between trailing and forward multiples implies earnings expectations are relatively stable — the portfolio is not being priced for an earnings inflection. A PEG above 2.5 implies investors are paying well above fair value for the growth embedded in estimates — a setup that typically leaves little room for earnings disappointment. A current ratio reading of 1.19 suggests the portfolio's holdings carry less short-term financial cushion than the broader market average. In total, the multiple and liquidity readings describe a portfolio where valuation is a secondary risk relative to earnings delivery — the numbers are defensible if estimates hold.

Margins & Cash Generation

Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 61.65%, operating margin at 29.95%, and free cash flow margin at 2.83%. The gross margin reading is exceptional — a reliable indicator of competitively advantaged businesses. Operating margins are in good shape, consistent with businesses that maintain reasonable earnings conversion after overhead. At this level, free cash flow is not a meaningful source of financial flexibility for the portfolio's underlying holdings. Read together, these margin levels suggest a portfolio where earnings durability is present in parts but not consistent across the full holding set.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Two key indicators frame the near-term view: TTM revenue growth of 11.75% a signal of steady demand without the volatility of high-growth names, while the estimated 12-month price change of 8.94%, where implied appreciation is modest based on current target assumptions. The near-term return case is built on whether reported trends and analyst projections can remain close enough to make current prices look justified. Whether the setup resolves positively or negatively will depend as much on the macro backdrop as on the capacity of the underlying businesses to deliver against current estimates. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

Taken together, the signals neither mandate urgency nor raise serious alarm — the profile warrants monitoring as the picture evolves.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.