XLRE State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| WELL | 10.26% |
| PLD | 9.17% |
| EQIX | 7.24% |
| AMT | 5.92% |
| DLR | 4.65% |
| SPG | 4.61% |
| O | 4.45% |
| CBRE | 4.44% |
| VTR | 4.42% |
| PSA | 4.28% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLRE) currently reports 31 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately broad range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is WELL (10.26%), PLD (9.17%), EQIX (7.24%), with WELL as the largest single weight at 10.26%. Together, the top three holdings account for 26.67%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 4.86%, WACC is 7.95%, and the economic spread is -3.09%. On balance, capital is being deployed at rates below what debt and equity holders require, a headwind to long-term value creation if sustained. Supporting metrics show ROE at 13.26% and ROA at 3.05%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
From a pricing standpoint, the portfolio sits at trailing P/E of 25.93, forward P/E of 36.18, PEG of 11.47. The narrow spread between trailing and forward multiples implies earnings expectations are relatively stable — the portfolio is not being priced for an earnings inflection. A PEG above 2.5 implies investors are paying well above fair value for the growth embedded in estimates — a setup that typically leaves little room for earnings disappointment. A current ratio reading of 1.42 suggests the portfolio's holdings carry less short-term financial cushion than the broader market average. In total, the multiple and liquidity readings describe a portfolio where valuation is a secondary risk relative to earnings delivery — the numbers are defensible if estimates hold.
Margins & Cash Generation
Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 62.13%, operating margin at 30.34%, and free cash flow margin at 2.44%. The gross margin reading is exceptional — a reliable indicator of competitively advantaged businesses. Operating margins this strong typically indicate a combination of pricing power, cost discipline, and operating leverage. At this level, free cash flow is not a meaningful source of financial flexibility for the portfolio's underlying holdings. Read together, these margin levels suggest a portfolio where earnings durability is present in parts but not consistent across the full holding set.
Growth & Forward Outlook
Two key indicators frame the near-term view: TTM revenue growth of 8.13% a signal of steady demand without the volatility of high-growth names, while the estimated 12-month price change of 13.77%, where the target distribution indicates incremental upside rather than outsized repricing. The near-term return case is built on whether reported trends and analyst projections can remain close enough to make current prices look justified. Whether the setup resolves positively or negatively will depend as much on the macro backdrop as on the capacity of the underlying businesses to deliver against current estimates. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
The balance of evidence is not favorable enough to recommend action — this profile is best approached defensively, with a focus on understanding the downside scenarios before committing capital.
These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.