XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF

Expense Ratio
0.08%
Dividend
2.57%
Previous close
$46.34
Est. 12 months change
+6.32%
Projected Price
$49.27

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
11.37%
Return on Assets (ROA)
3.01%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
4.42%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
6.28%
ROIC - WACC
-1.87%
Updated : 2026-04-03 19:30 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
22.78
Forward P/E
19.38
PEG Ratio
2.48
Debt Current Ratio
0.81

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
46.44%
Operating Margin
23.98%
FCF Margin
3.59%
TTM Revenue Growth
12.96%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
17.54%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
1.96%
Price % from 200 SMA
6.09%
6 Months
5.45%
1 Year
16.70%
2 Years
41.80%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NEE13.55%
SO7.48%
DUK7.13%
CEG6.10%
AEP4.99%
SRE4.46%
D3.72%
ETR3.60%
EXC3.51%
VST3.44%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) currently reports 31 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the selectively diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NEE (13.55%), SO (7.48%), DUK (7.13%), with NEE as the largest single weight at 13.55%. Together, the top three holdings account for 28.16%, which points to a relatively flat weight distribution where no single cluster of names dominates outcomes. The weight distribution suggests a portfolio designed to capture thematic upside while avoiding excessive dependence on any single name outside the largest positions.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Assessing the quality of returns on invested capital, ROIC is 4.42%, WACC is 6.28%, and the economic spread is -1.87%. On balance, the portfolio's businesses are not clearing their capital cost hurdle, meaning reinvestment may be diluting rather than compounding value. Supporting metrics show ROE at 11.37% and ROA at 3.01%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

The current pricing of the underlying holdings reads trailing P/E of 22.78, forward P/E of 19.38, PEG of 2.48. The small spread between trailing and forward P/E suggests neither meaningful acceleration nor deterioration is currently priced into the earnings outlook. The PEG ratio signals a portfolio priced at reasonable growth-adjusted value — adequate for the earnings outlook, without offering an obvious margin of safety. The current ratio of 0.81 is below average, suggesting some holdings may face tighter short-term financial conditions. In aggregate, the valuation reads as fair to moderately stretched — leaving the investment case dependent on earnings execution rather than multiple expansion.

Margins & Cash Generation

Looking at margins from gross to free cash flow, gross margin sits at 46.44%, operating margin at 23.98%, and free cash flow margin at 3.59%. Gross margins are constructive — not exceptional, but indicative of businesses with reasonable unit economics. At this level, operating margins reflect businesses that are scaling with discipline without dramatic cost pressure. The portfolio's cash conversion is poor at this level — a sign of capital-intensive or loss-making businesses across much of the basket. Together, these margins describe a portfolio where business quality varies — and where macro or sector headwinds could disproportionately impact the weaker-margin holdings.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Projected 12-month EPS growth of 17.5% adds a powerful forward signal — analyst consensus expects earnings to accelerate materially, which, if delivered, could make current multiples look increasingly modest. Zooming out from the valuation discussion, TTM revenue growth of 12.96% pointing to stable operational progress without outsized acceleration, while the estimated 12-month price change of 6.38%, where street expectations indicate a low-ceiling return setup in the near term. Anchoring to reported revenues provides discipline; analyst price targets add context about how the market currently values that operating reality. The path to realizing analyst-implied returns runs through revenue execution, margin stability, and a macro environment that doesn't undermine either. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The fundamental picture is not broken, but neither is it clearly compelling — a hold posture reflects the absence of an obvious catalyst for re-rating in either direction.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.