XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF

Expense Ratio
0.25%
Dividend
2.90%
Previous close
$63.71
Est. 12 months change
+12.62%
Projected Price
$71.75

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
14.01%
Return on Assets (ROA)
4.95%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
9.41%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
6.93%
ROIC - WACC
2.48%
Updated : 2026-04-04 07:28 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
17.75
Forward P/E
16.35
PEG Ratio
4.32
Debt Current Ratio
1.98

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
55.53%
Operating Margin
30.35%
FCF Margin
24.65%
TTM Revenue Growth
10.32%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
8.55%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-1.77%
Price % from 200 SMA
0.66%
6 Months
0.88%
1 Year
2.41%
2 Years
14.32%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
OGE1.91%
IDA1.85%
NJR1.79%
ADC1.78%
SR1.72%
TXNM1.66%
OGS1.64%
POR1.61%
NFG1.59%
NNN1.54%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) currently reports 81 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is OGE (1.91%), IDA (1.85%), NJR (1.79%), with OGE as the largest single weight at 1.91%. Together, the top three holdings account for 5.55%, which suggests a more balanced distribution of weight across the portfolio, reducing single-name sensitivity at the top. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 9.41%, WACC is 6.93%, and the economic spread is 2.48%. On balance, the economic spread is positive but compressed — adequate for value preservation, less convincing for aggressive compounding. Supporting metrics show ROE at 14.01% and ROA at 4.95%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

From a pricing standpoint, the portfolio sits at trailing P/E of 17.75, forward P/E of 16.35, PEG of 4.32. The narrow spread between trailing and forward multiples implies earnings expectations are relatively stable — the portfolio is not being priced for an earnings inflection. A PEG above 2.5 implies investors are paying well above fair value for the growth embedded in estimates — a setup that typically leaves little room for earnings disappointment. A current ratio of 1.98 suggests the holdings have sufficient short-term liquidity without excess. In total, the multiple and liquidity readings describe a portfolio where valuation is a secondary risk relative to earnings delivery — the numbers are defensible if estimates hold.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 55.53%, operating margin at 30.35%, and free cash flow margin at 24.65%. Gross margins are healthy, suggesting solid pricing power across the underlying holdings. At this operating margin level, the portfolio's holdings demonstrate strong operational discipline and meaningful earnings leverage. At this FCF margin level, the underlying holdings demonstrate good cash generation relative to the revenue base. Together, these margin readings describe a portfolio of businesses that protect profitability at every layer of the income statement.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Revenue trends and analyst expectations together suggest: TTM revenue growth of 10.32% indicating steady top-line growth at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 12.75%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At 8.6%, projected EPS growth is present and positive — not a standout catalyst, but a stabilizing element in the overall forward picture. There is always distance between what is reported and what is priced; the question of whether that distance is closing or widening is what makes the setup interesting. In either direction, the fundamental driver of returns will be whether the underlying businesses can sustain the trajectory that is already being priced. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

Overall, the fundamentals support a constructive stance — execution remains the key driver of whether the forward case is fully validated.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.