XSW State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF

Expense Ratio
0.35%
Dividend
0.04%
Previous close
$166.16
Est. 12 months change
+33.79%
Projected Price
$222.31

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
7.96%
Return on Assets (ROA)
0.98%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
8.38%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
11.11%
ROIC - WACC
-2.73%
Updated : 2026-06-13 06:29 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
19.31
Forward P/E
14.96
PEG Ratio
2.93
Debt Current Ratio
2.72

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
66.12%
Operating Margin
-6.08%
FCF Margin
23.56%
TTM Revenue Growth
35.12%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
29.03%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
4.92%
Price % from 200 SMA
-4.77%
6 Months
-13.72%
1 Year
-9.63%
2 Years
11.93%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
APPS1.80%
HUT1.52%
AIP1.49%
DDOG1.23%
RIOT1.18%
WULF1.15%
FTNT1.15%
CIFR1.13%
CORZ1.13%
CLSK1.13%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) currently reports 134 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the index-like in breadth range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is APPS (1.80%), HUT (1.52%), AIP (1.49%), with APPS as the largest single weight at 1.80%. Together, the top three holdings account for 4.81%, which reflects a construction where the top positions carry meaningful but not outsized influence on aggregate returns. In aggregate, the construction reflects a balance between directional conviction and the diversification benefits that come from a broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On the question of capital productivity, ROIC is 8.38%, WACC is 11.11%, and the economic spread is -2.73%. On balance, the spread between returns and funding costs is negative — a dynamic that pressures intrinsic value unless operating performance improves. Supporting metrics show ROE at 7.96% and ROA at 0.98%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

Assessed on a multiple basis, trailing P/E of 19.31, forward P/E of 14.96, PEG of 2.93. Forward P/E tracks closely with trailing P/E — a sign that the market sees the current earnings run rate as a reasonable baseline going forward. At this PEG level, the valuation case rests more on quality, scarcity, or market leadership than on earnings growth alone. The portfolio's holdings carry a current ratio of 2.72, pointing to strong short-term financial health. Overall, the valuation setup reads as a balance between expected growth and execution risk, with liquidity acting as an important stabilizer if macro conditions become less favorable.

Margins & Cash Generation

The margin stack reads as follows: gross margin sits at 66.12%, operating margin at -6.08%, and free cash flow margin at 23.56%. Gross margins at this level typically indicate businesses with structural pricing advantages and low direct cost sensitivity. Operating margins this compressed indicate businesses where the path to earnings remains dependent on future scale. FCF margins are constructive here, reflecting holdings that generate cash reliably after reinvestment requirements. The margin profile is a mixed read — some holdings are clearly well-run, but the aggregate numbers point to a basket that is not uniformly high-quality.

Growth & Forward Outlook

The forward view combines two signals: the estimated 12-month price change of 34.13%, where the forward target set implies considerable headroom versus current levels, while TTM revenue growth of 35.12% suggesting the portfolio's businesses are collectively capturing meaningful market share or pricing power. The projected 12-month EPS growth rate of 29.0% is a standout component of the forward case — meaningful earnings expansion at this scale typically warrants attention from growth-oriented investors. One metric reflects operational reality, the other market expectation — both are useful inputs, but neither should be read in isolation. The interaction between revenue execution and analyst repricing will ultimately determine how closely realized returns track current expectations. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Buy

The overall evidence base is constructive, with more signals pointing up than down and no obvious structural impairment to the forward case.

These findings are based solely on the metrics presented and do not constitute an investment recommendation. Always perform your own due diligence before committing capital.