XTL State Street SPDR S&P Telecom ETF

Expense Ratio
0.35%
Dividend
0.96%
Previous close
$206.96
Est. 12 months change
+7.68%
Projected Price
$222.86

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
8.75%
Return on Assets (ROA)
4.07%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
14.36%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.39%
ROIC - WACC
4.96%
Updated : 2026-04-08 20:22 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
12.02
Forward P/E
20.31
PEG Ratio
1.93
Debt Current Ratio
2.54

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
55.34%
Operating Margin
-12.91%
FCF Margin
19.97%
TTM Revenue Growth
62.32%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
-40.83%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
13.33%
Price % from 200 SMA
37.56%
6 Months
36.11%
1 Year
138.08%
2 Years
188.98%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
GSAT4.26%
IRDM4.19%
CIEN4.16%
LITE3.89%
VIAV3.87%
VSAT3.66%
UI3.47%
VISN3.33%
LUMN3.32%
ASTS3.32%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

State Street SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) currently reports 41 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is GSAT (4.26%), IRDM (4.19%), CIEN (4.16%), with GSAT as the largest single weight at 4.26%. Together, the top three holdings account for 12.61%, which indicates that performance drivers are distributed more evenly across the broader basket. This architecture allows the fund to express a clear investment thesis at the top while relying on the broader basket to manage idiosyncratic volatility.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

From a capital efficiency perspective, ROIC is 14.36%, WACC is 9.39%, and the economic spread is 4.96%. On balance, holdings marginally exceed their cost of capital, suggesting modest but present value creation. Supporting metrics show ROE at 8.75% and ROA at 4.07%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

Multiple analysis puts the portfolio at trailing P/E of 12.02, forward P/E of 20.31, PEG of 1.93. Trailing and forward multiples are nearly identical, indicating the market is pricing the portfolio on a relatively static earnings assumption. On a PEG basis, valuation is in the middle ground — fair for the growth on offer, with the return case resting on earnings delivery rather than re-rating. The current ratio of 2.54 indicates holdings are well-positioned to meet near-term obligations. The combined valuation and liquidity profile points to a portfolio where current prices embed meaningful growth expectations, and where delivery against those expectations will drive the return outcome.

Margins & Cash Generation

On the margin front: gross margin sits at 55.34%, operating margin at -12.91%, and free cash flow margin at 19.97%. At this level, the portfolio reflects reasonable cost discipline and adequate pricing leverage at the production layer. The operating margin reading is weak, suggesting cost structures are outpacing revenue generation across much of the portfolio. Strong free cash flow margins point to businesses with meaningful financial flexibility and limited dependence on external capital. The margin stack is not uniformly strong, which means the portfolio's earnings resilience under adverse conditions is less certain.

Growth & Forward Outlook

The two main inputs to the near-term picture — TTM revenue growth of 62.32% reflecting robust top-line expansion across the underlying holdings. Consensus EPS estimates point to a decline of -40.8% over the next 12 months, adding a layer of risk to the forward case and warranting caution on the earnings trajectory. Analyst price targets suggest the target set points to a fairly constrained upside profile on a 12-month view. Revenue momentum establishes the baseline; analyst price targets reveal how much the market is already paying for future execution on top of that baseline. Delivered returns will ultimately be shaped by the gap — or lack thereof — between operating execution and the expectations embedded in current prices. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

Overall, the setup is mixed enough that patience is probably the right posture until clarity improves on the key variables.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.