ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

Expense Ratio
0.5%
Dividend
1.62%
Previous close
$32.60
Est. 12 months change
+4.53%
Projected Price
$34.08

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
10.39%
Return on Assets (ROA)
3.59%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
5.69%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
7.21%
ROIC - WACC
-1.52%
Updated : 2026-04-04 05:27 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
23.02
Forward P/E
20.87
PEG Ratio
2.53
Debt Current Ratio
1.01

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
45.15%
Operating Margin
20.26%
FCF Margin
8.22%
TTM Revenue Growth
15.15%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
10.28%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
1.78%
Price % from 200 SMA
9.73%
6 Months
9.54%
1 Year
30.56%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
PWR4.85%
ETR4.55%
AME4.41%
ED4.40%
AEP4.38%
NEE4.28%
NGG4.28%
EXC4.04%
D4.01%
DUK4.01%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) currently reports 50 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately broad range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is PWR (4.85%), ETR (4.55%), AME (4.41%), with PWR as the largest single weight at 4.85%. Together, the top three holdings account for 13.81%, which suggests the fund is not overly reliant on its largest positions to generate returns. The fund's architecture positions it to benefit from strength in its top holdings while the broader basket provides a degree of insulation against single-name shocks.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

Looking at how effectively the underlying holdings deploy capital, ROIC is 5.69%, WACC is 7.21%, and the economic spread is -1.52%. On balance, capital is being deployed at rates below what debt and equity holders require, a headwind to long-term value creation if sustained. Supporting metrics show ROE at 10.39% and ROA at 3.59%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.

Valuation

On valuation, the portfolio registers trailing P/E of 23.02, forward P/E of 20.87, PEG of 2.53. The minimal trailing-to-forward compression implies limited earnings growth expectations are embedded in current prices. The PEG ratio is elevated relative to historical norms, implying the market is paying a meaningful premium for the earnings trajectory embedded in analyst estimates. A current ratio reading of 1.01 suggests the portfolio's holdings carry less short-term financial cushion than the broader market average. Taken together, the multiple and liquidity picture suggests a portfolio that is priced for a constructive outcome — but where execution against earnings estimates will be the key determinant of whether that price is justified.

Margins & Cash Generation

Across the three margin layers, gross margin sits at 45.15%, operating margin at 20.26%, and free cash flow margin at 8.22%. Gross margins sit in a healthy range, consistent with businesses that manage input costs effectively. Operating margins are in good shape, consistent with businesses that maintain reasonable earnings conversion after overhead. At this level, free cash flow generation is present but not a defining strength of the portfolio's underlying businesses. Read together, these margin levels suggest a portfolio where earnings durability is present in parts but not consistent across the full holding set.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Two key indicators frame the near-term view: TTM revenue growth of 15.15% a signal of steady demand without the volatility of high-growth names, while the estimated 12-month price change of 4.58%, where implied appreciation is modest based on current target assumptions. The near-term return case is built on whether reported trends and analyst projections can remain close enough to make current prices look justified. Whether the setup resolves positively or negatively will depend as much on the macro backdrop as on the capacity of the underlying businesses to deliver against current estimates. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

Taken together, the signals neither mandate urgency nor raise serious alarm — the profile warrants monitoring as the picture evolves.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.