FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
Profitability Metrics
Valuation Metrics
Growth & Cash Flow
Price Change
Top 10 Holdings
| Stock Ticker | Weight |
|---|---|
| NEE | 12.11% |
| SO | 6.75% |
| DUK | 6.44% |
| CEG | 5.44% |
| AEP | 4.45% |
| SRE | 4.02% |
| D | 3.35% |
| VST | 3.30% |
| ETR | 3.21% |
| EXC | 3.12% |
ETF Analysis
Fund Overview
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) currently reports 63 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the moderately diversified range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NEE (12.11%), SO (6.75%), DUK (6.44%), with NEE as the largest single weight at 12.11%. Together, the top three holdings account for 25.30%, which indicates that performance drivers are distributed more evenly across the broader basket. This architecture allows the fund to express a clear investment thesis at the top while relying on the broader basket to manage idiosyncratic volatility.
Profitability & Capital Efficiency
From a capital efficiency perspective, ROIC is 4.28%, WACC is 6.43%, and the economic spread is -2.14%. On balance, holdings are currently generating returns below their cost of capital, which may weigh on intrinsic value over time. Supporting metrics show ROE at 10.68% and ROA at 2.93%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that likely needs operating improvement before returns quality can be considered durable.
Valuation
Turning to how the market is pricing the underlying earnings, trailing P/E of 22.51, forward P/E of 19.12, PEG of 2.47. Trailing and forward valuations are closely aligned, pointing to a market that is pricing continuity rather than improvement in the earnings outlook. A PEG in this range suggests valuation is fair rather than compelling — the portfolio is priced adequately for its growth, with limited buffer for downside revisions. At 0.99, the aggregate current ratio reflects holdings with limited near-term liquidity buffer. The combined picture across P/E, forward P/E, PEG, and current ratio suggests a portfolio that is priced for continued execution — where disappointment would be costly and outperformance would likely require positive earnings surprises.
Margins & Cash Generation
On the margin front: gross margin sits at 46.43%, operating margin at 22.14%, and free cash flow margin at 4.65%. At this level, the portfolio reflects reasonable cost discipline and adequate pricing leverage at the production layer. Operating margins sit in a healthy range — not exceptional, but indicating reasonable operational efficiency. Weak free cash flow margins point to holdings where near-term cash generation is constrained by investment or operational cash demands. The margin stack is not uniformly strong, which means the portfolio's earnings resilience under adverse conditions is less certain.
Growth & Forward Outlook
The two main inputs to the near-term picture — TTM revenue growth of 12.81% reflecting consistent if unspectacular revenue expansion. Consensus EPS estimates point to 17.7% earnings growth over the next 12 months — a compelling near-term earnings catalyst that, if delivered, changes the valuation conversation materially. Analyst price targets suggest the target set points to a fairly constrained upside profile on a 12-month view. Revenue momentum establishes the baseline; analyst price targets reveal how much the market is already paying for future execution on top of that baseline. Delivered returns will ultimately be shaped by the gap — or lack thereof — between operating execution and the expectations embedded in current prices. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.
Conclusion
HoldOverall, the setup is mixed enough that patience is probably the right posture until clarity improves on the key variables.
This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.