INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

Expense Ratio
0.29%
Dividend
4.80%
Previous close
$66.99
Est. 12 months change
+12.03%
Projected Price
$75.05

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
25.91%
Return on Assets (ROA)
4.70%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
9.66%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
7.86%
ROIC - WACC
1.80%
Updated : 2026-05-21 20:09 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
9.68
Forward P/E
16.54
PEG Ratio
2.23
Debt Current Ratio
1.40

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
35.44%
Operating Margin
-28.81%
FCF Margin
15.51%
TTM Revenue Growth
1.76%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
-41.48%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
1.89%
Price % from 200 SMA
7.39%
6 Months
13.32%
1 Year
20.66%
2 Years
23.65%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
NA17.75%
ADI4.67%
PEP4.36%
PG3.95%
CVX3.86%
SO3.85%
LMT3.60%
VZ3.44%
JNJ3.39%
JCI3.04%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) currently reports 43 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is NA (17.75%), ADI (4.67%), PEP (4.36%), with NA as the largest single weight at 17.75%. Together, the top three holdings account for 26.78%, which suggests a more balanced distribution of weight across the portfolio, reducing single-name sensitivity at the top. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 9.66%, WACC is 7.86%, and the economic spread is 1.80%. On balance, the economic spread is positive but compressed — adequate for value preservation, less convincing for aggressive compounding. Supporting metrics show ROE at 25.91% and ROA at 4.70%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio that is value-creative but with less room for execution slippage.

Valuation

On an earnings multiple basis, trailing P/E of 9.68, forward P/E of 16.54, PEG of 2.23. The gap between trailing and forward multiples is not especially wide, suggesting the market is pricing a steadier earnings path rather than a sharp near-term re-rating. The PEG ratio sits in a range that most investors would consider fair — neither cheap nor obviously stretched relative to anticipated earnings. A current ratio of 1.40 signals that short-term coverage is tighter than typical across the holding set. Combining multiples and liquidity, the portfolio appears adequately priced for its current earnings trajectory, with balance sheet health providing a degree of downside resilience.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 35.44%, operating margin at -28.81%, and free cash flow margin at 15.51%. Gross margins are moderate, reflecting industry conditions where input costs weigh more heavily on revenue. At this operating margin level, businesses are generating little to no earnings after overhead — a sign of early-stage or high-investment dynamics. At this FCF margin level, the underlying holdings demonstrate good cash generation relative to the revenue base. Across the three margin layers, the picture is inconsistent — a reminder that aggregate metrics can mask meaningful variation at the individual holding level.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of 1.76% indicating muted but still positive top-line momentum across the portfolio, while the estimated 12-month price change of 12.15%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At -41.5%, the projected 12-month EPS growth is a notable negative — it suggests earnings headwinds are building, a dynamic that usually invites multiple compression rather than expansion. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Hold

The balance of evidence suggests a neutral posture is appropriate — there are merits here, but also reasons for caution that limit conviction at current levels.

The views expressed above are derived from quantitative data only and should not be relied upon as financial advice. Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance.