RFG Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

Expense Ratio
0.35%
Dividend
0.36%
Previous close
$55.60
Est. 12 months change
+13.37%
Projected Price
$63.04

Profitability Metrics

Return on Equity (ROE)
23.83%
Return on Assets (ROA)
7.80%
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
26.18%
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
9.63%
ROIC - WACC
16.55%
Updated : 2026-04-04 08:35 ET

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio
28.07
Forward P/E
22.00
PEG Ratio
1.76
Debt Current Ratio
2.62

Growth & Cash Flow

Gross Margin
47.53%
Operating Margin
19.39%
FCF Margin
17.56%
TTM Revenue Growth
31.29%
Projected 12M EPS Growth
27.58%

Price Change

Price % from 50 SMA
-1.24%
Price % from 200 SMA
5.84%
6 Months
8.58%
1 Year
23.16%
2 Years
11.74%
The above metrics represent weighted averages, calculated using each stock's individual value weighted by its proportion of ETF holdings.

Top 10 Holdings

Stock TickerWeight
VAL2.46%
FTI2.46%
ARWR2.18%
WWD2.13%
MTZ2.06%
IDCC2.02%
FIVE2.02%
CRS2.00%
HALO1.91%
STRL1.85%

ETF Analysis

Fund Overview

Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) currently reports 94 stock positions (subject to change), placing it in the diversified without being diffuse range by holdings breadth. The top line-up is VAL (2.46%), FTI (2.46%), ARWR (2.18%), with VAL as the largest single weight at 2.46%. Together, the top three holdings account for 7.10%, which suggests a more balanced distribution of weight across the portfolio, reducing single-name sensitivity at the top. Taken together, the portfolio's structure reflects a deliberate trade-off between conviction at the top and risk spreading across the broader holding set.

Profitability & Capital Efficiency

On a capital return basis, ROIC is 26.18%, WACC is 9.63%, and the economic spread is 16.55%. On balance, ROIC clears WACC by a meaningful margin, suggesting the portfolio's holdings are creating rather than consuming intrinsic value. Supporting metrics show ROE at 23.83% and ROA at 7.80%, a combination that helps frame whether profitability strength is broad enough to hold through different market conditions. Taken together, the return profile suggests a portfolio with credible compounding capacity if current operating execution persists.

Valuation

On valuation, the portfolio registers trailing P/E of 28.07, forward P/E of 22.00, PEG of 1.76. The spread between the two P/E figures is moderate, suggesting earnings are expected to improve gradually rather than accelerate sharply. The PEG reading here implies the market is pricing growth at roughly fair value — a setup where the investment case depends more on execution than on multiple expansion. A current ratio of 2.62 across the holding set reflects strong short-term liquidity. Taken together, the multiple and liquidity picture suggests a portfolio that is priced for a constructive outcome — but where execution against earnings estimates will be the key determinant of whether that price is justified.

Margins & Cash Generation

Stripping to unit economics, gross margin sits at 47.53%, operating margin at 19.39%, and free cash flow margin at 17.56%. Gross margins are healthy, suggesting solid pricing power across the underlying holdings. The operating margin reading is constructive, suggesting management teams are managing overhead costs effectively. At this FCF margin level, the underlying holdings demonstrate good cash generation relative to the revenue base. Across the three margin layers, the picture is inconsistent — a reminder that aggregate metrics can mask meaningful variation at the individual holding level.

Growth & Forward Outlook

Connecting operational trends with market expectations, TTM revenue growth of 31.29% indicating strong organic momentum at the portfolio level, while the estimated 12-month price change of 13.51%, where consensus targets suggest reasonable upside rather than a step-change rerating. At 27.6%, the projected 12-month EPS growth rate is strong enough to be a primary driver of the forward investment case rather than a peripheral supporting detail. Operating momentum and analyst expectations are related but distinct — the former is backward-looking by nature, the latter inherently speculative. Against that backdrop, the more durable question is whether operating trends can be sustained long enough for analyst expectations to be validated. The estimated 12-month price change is a weighted composite of analyst price target estimates adjusted by each holding's ETF weight, sourced from publicly available data, and should not be interpreted as a reliable prediction of future performance.

Conclusion

Strong Buy

The aggregate picture across capital efficiency, valuation, growth, and cash generation builds a compelling case.

This assessment reflects quantitative metrics only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results.